Artificial nutrition support in hospitals in the United Kingdom - 1991: Second national survey
- PMID: 16839997
- DOI: 10.1016/0261-5614(92)90027-n
Artificial nutrition support in hospitals in the United Kingdom - 1991: Second national survey
Abstract
Objective - to determine current clinical practice of nutrition support in hospitals in the UK and to determine whether there have been any apparent changes in practices since 1988. Design - An 81 question survey about enteral and parenteral nutriton was sent to all District Dietitians registered with the British Dietetic Association. Information was collected additionally from pharmacists and clinicians. Results - 61.2% of questionnaires distributed were completed and returned. 32.5% of respondents had access to nutrition support teams, compared with 27% in 1988. The documentation of usage of nutrition support was poor, only 33% being able to accurately quantify administation of enteral nutrition, and 53% parenteral nutrition. Since 1988 the number of respondents using peripheral parenteral nutrition had doubled to 15%. Those using percutaneous gastrostomies had increased from 6% to 74%. Those using respiratory enteral diet formulations had quadrupled to 33%. There have been no other apparent major changes in nutrition support practice in the UK, in the last 3 years. Conclusions - Despite increasing awareness about the role of artificial nutrition support, and the value of Nutrition Support Teams there has been little or no progress in the provision or monitoring of support in the last 3 years. This has important implications when considering audit of such practices.
Similar articles
-
Artificial nutrition support in hospitals in the United Kingdom--1994: Third national survey.Clin Nutr. 1995 Dec;14(6):329-35. doi: 10.1016/s0261-5614(95)80049-2. Clin Nutr. 1995. PMID: 16843953
-
Standards of practice for the nutrition support dietitian: importance and value to practitioners.J Am Diet Assoc. 1993 Oct;93(10):1113-6; quiz 1117-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-8223(93)91640-c. J Am Diet Assoc. 1993. PMID: 8409131
-
Clinical guidelines and enteral nutrition support: a survey of dietetic practice in the United Kingdom.Eur J Clin Nutr. 2012 Jan;66(1):130-5. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2011.153. Epub 2011 Sep 7. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2012. PMID: 21897426
-
Artificial nutritional support in clinical practice in Britain.J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1993 Jan;27(1):8-15. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1993. PMID: 8426351 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Nutrition support in Brazil: past, present, and future perspectives.JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2004 May-Jun;28(3):184-91. doi: 10.1177/0148607104028003184. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2004. PMID: 15141413 Review.
Cited by
-
Artificial nutrition support in intensive care units in Spain. Nutritional and Metabolic Working Group of the Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine and Coronary Units (SEMIUC).Intensive Care Med. 1995 Oct;21(10):842-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01700969. Intensive Care Med. 1995. PMID: 8557874
-
Changes in nutritional status associated with unresectable pancreatic cancer.Br J Cancer. 1997;75(1):106-9. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1997.17. Br J Cancer. 1997. PMID: 9000606 Free PMC article.
-
Moderately high-protein enteral formula improved retinol-binding protein in tube-fed patients: A multicentre open study.Nutr Health. 2017 Sep;23(3):203-209. doi: 10.1177/0260106017729959. Nutr Health. 2017. PMID: 28929948 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of combined parenteral and enteral nutrition for patients with a critical illness: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jan;99(3):e18778. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018778. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 32011471 Free PMC article.
-
Nutrition therapy for critically ill and injured patients.Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2013 Jun;39(3):203-13. doi: 10.1007/s00068-013-0272-8. Epub 2013 Mar 8. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2013. PMID: 26815227
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources