Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Aug;80(15):7491-9.
doi: 10.1128/JVI.00435-06.

Surface mutagenesis of the bovine papillomavirus E1 DNA binding domain reveals residues required for multiple functions related to DNA replication

Affiliations

Surface mutagenesis of the bovine papillomavirus E1 DNA binding domain reveals residues required for multiple functions related to DNA replication

Stephen Schuck et al. J Virol. 2006 Aug.

Abstract

The E1 protein from papillomaviruses is a multifunctional protein with complex functions required for the initiation of viral DNA replication. We have performed a surface mutagenesis of the well-characterized E1 DNA binding domain (DBD). We demonstrate that substitutions of multiple residues on the surface of the E1 DBD are defective for DNA replication without affecting the DNA binding activity of the protein. The defects of individual substitutions include failure to form the double trimer that melts the ori and failure to form the double hexamer that unwinds the ori. These results demonstrate that the DBD plays an essential role in multiple DNA replication-related processes apart from DNA binding.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Space-filling representation of the E1 DBD dimer as determined by X-ray crystallography. The colored residues in panel A represent the 63 residues on the surface of the E1 DBD that were changed to alanines. In panel B, the 12 residues that had a significant deleterious effect on DNA replication when changed to alanine are shown.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
(A) In vivo expression of mutant E1 proteins. The E1 expression vectors that were unable to support DNA replication in vivo were transfected into COS cells. Forty-eight hours after transfection, the cells were lysed by the addition of Laemmli-loading dye and the resulting lysates were analyzed by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose, and probed with a monoclonal E1 antibody. (B) In vivo replication assays. Replication assays were carried out by transfection of the E1 and E2 expression vectors pCGE1 and pCGE2, together with the ori plasmids X/12/X (proximal E2 BS) and 11/X/X (distal E2 BS) (25). In lanes 1 and 2, wt E1 and wt E2 were used. In lanes 3 and 4, wt E1 and the mutant E2 (388/390) (13) were used. In lanes 5 through 28, the respective E1 mutants were cotransfected with wt E2. Low-molecular-weight DNA was harvested 48 and 60 h after transfection, digested with DpnI, EcoO109I, and HindIII, run on agarose gels, transferred to nitrocellulose, and probed with an ori probe. After digestion with EcoO109I and HindIII, the ori plasmid with the proximal E2 BS gives rise to a 2.5-kb band and the plasmid with the distal E2 BS gives rise to a 2.9-kb band.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
(A) Purification of mutant E1 proteins from E. coli. The mutant E1 proteins were expressed in E. coli and purified using established procedures. wt E1 (lane 1) and the mutant proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie brilliant blue. (B) DNA binding activity of mutant E1 proteins. The 12 mutant E1 proteins were tested for sequence-specific ori binding by EMSA in the presence of ADP using a 39-bp probe centered on the E1 BS. Two quantities, 30 and 60 fmol, of the wt and mutant proteins were used in lanes 1 through 19. For the mutants W295A, I296A, K168A, and G290A, which had reduced DNA binding activity, 120 and 240 fmols of E1 were used (lanes 20 through 27).
FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.
(A) In vitro DNA replication using mutant E1 proteins. The 12 mutant E1 proteins were tested for their abilities to support DNA replication in a cell-free replication system, followed by analysis of the replication products by agarose gel electrophoresis. In lane 1, no E1 was added. In lane 2, 200 ng of wt E1 was added, and in lane 3, 400 ng of wt E1 was added. In lanes 4 through 15, 200 ng of the respective mutant E1 was added. (B) The level of incorporation of [α-32P]dCTP for wt E1 and for each mutant was quantitated and is shown in a bar graph.
FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.
DNA helicase activity of mutant E1 proteins. Three quantities of wt and mutant E1 proteins (8, 15, and 30 fmol) were tested for the ability to displace a labeled oligonucleotide annealed to an M13 template at 37°C. The displaced labeled oligonucleotide was quantitated, and the fraction of input was plotted as a function of E1 levels.
FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.
Double hexamer formation by E1 mutants. EMSA was performed using the 32-bp ori probe. Sixty and 120 fmol of wt and mutant E1, respectively, were used in the presence of ATP.
FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.
Formation of double trimers and double hexamers by E1 mutants. EMSA was performed using the 84-bp ori probe. Thirty, 60, or 120 fmol of wt and mutant E1 was used in the presence of ATP or ADP as indicated in the figure. Lane 1 in all three panels contained probe alone.
FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.
(A) Ori fragment unwinding by E1 mutants. Ori fragment unwinding was carried out using the 84-bp ori probe. In lane 1, top panel, probe alone was added. In lanes 2 and 3, top panel, E. coli SSB was added to double-stranded probe (lane 2) or denatured probe (lane 3). In lane 4, top panel, wt E1 was added in the absence of SSB. In lanes 5 through 25, top panel, and lanes 1 through 21, bottom panel, 40, 80, and 160 fmol of wt E1 and the respective mutants were used. (B) The unwinding reactions in panel A were quantitated, and the fraction of single-stranded DNA generated was plotted as a function of E1 concentration for each mutant.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abbate, E. A., J. M. Berger, and M. R. Botchan. 2004. The X-ray structure of the papillomavirus helicase in complex with its molecular matchmaker E2. Genes Dev. 18:1981-1996. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bullock, P. A. 1997. The initiation of simian virus 40 DNA replication in vitro. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 32:503-568. - PubMed
    1. Chen, G., and A. Stenlund. 1998. Characterization of the DNA-binding domain of the bovine papillomavirus replication initiator E1. J. Virol. 72:2567-2576. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen, G., and A. Stenlund. 2002. Sequential and ordered assembly of E1 initiator complexes on the papillomavirus origin of DNA replication generates progressive structural changes related to melting. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:7712-7720. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen, G., and A. Stenlund. 2001. The E1 initiator recognizes multiple overlapping sites in the papillomavirus origin of DNA replication. J. Virol. 75:292-302. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources