Bowel microorganisms--a target for selective antimicrobial control
- PMID: 1684194
- DOI: 10.1016/0195-6701(91)90166-6
Bowel microorganisms--a target for selective antimicrobial control
Abstract
This article reviews the eight factors that determine the outcome of selective antimicrobial control (SAC) a technique aimed at the clearance of intestinal Gram-negative bacillary carriage by means of lethal faecal anti-microbial concentrations. They are as follows: (i) the carrier state; (ii) compliance; (iii) SAC aiming at prophylaxis vs treatment; (iv) minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of the antimicrobial; (v) dosage; (vi) pharmacokinetics; (vii) faecal inactivation; and (viii) microorganisms to be controlled. In the second part, non-absorbable SAC regimens are compared with absorbable trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole (TMP/SMZ) and the fluoroquinolones in different clinical settings including neutropenia, intensive care, hepatic encephalopathy, liver transplantation and the salmonella carrier state. Ablation of gut carriage and superinfections are the main endpoints reviewed in this article. The newer fluoroquinolones are potent SAC agents to deal with enterobacteria. Pseudomonads are the major gap in their SAC spectrum. TMP/SMZ emerges as a SAC agent of limited value, whilst the newer non-absorbable combination of polymyxin/tobramycin seems to be the most potent SAC programme since it has activity against pseudomonads. In a third part, three current issues--the emergence of resistance, the selectivity and the tissue effect are discussed. Finally, a potent fluoroquinolone combined with oral polymyxin/tobramycin seems to be the most effective SAC programme currently available to control enterobacteria and pseudomonads in patients in whom bacterial translocation is a risk with minimal risk of resistance emerging.
Similar articles
-
Protecting neutropenic patients from bowel-derived organisms.J Hosp Infect. 1991 Sep;19 Suppl C:43-58. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(91)90167-7. J Hosp Infect. 1991. PMID: 1684195 Review.
-
Why not performing susceptibility test for trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole?J Chemother. 2015 Feb;27(2):124-5. doi: 10.1179/1973947814Y.0000000215. Epub 2014 Sep 23. J Chemother. 2015. PMID: 25248022 No abstract available.
-
Quinolones in the treatment of Salmonella carriers.Rev Infect Dis. 1989 Jul-Aug;11 Suppl 5:S1179-87. doi: 10.1093/clinids/11.supplement_5.s1179. Rev Infect Dis. 1989. PMID: 2672248 Review.
-
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole plus amikacin versus ceftazidime monotherapy as empirical treatment in patients with neutropenia and fever.Scand J Infect Dis. 1996;28(3):297-303. doi: 10.3109/00365549609027177. Scand J Infect Dis. 1996. PMID: 8863366 Clinical Trial.
-
Antimicrobial agents for the dermatologist. II. Macrolides, fluoroquinolones, rifamycins, tetracyclines, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and clindamycin.J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997 Sep;37(3 Pt 1):365-81; quiz 382-4. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(97)70135-x. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997. PMID: 9308549 Review.
Cited by
-
Indole and (E)-2-hexenal, phytochemical potentiators of polymyxins against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996 Jun;40(6):1438-41. doi: 10.1128/AAC.40.6.1438. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996. PMID: 8726016 Free PMC article.
-
All great truths are iconoclastic: selective decontamination of the digestive tract moves from heresy to level 1 truth.Intensive Care Med. 2003 May;29(5):677-90. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-1722-2. Epub 2003 Apr 10. Intensive Care Med. 2003. PMID: 12687326 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Miscellaneous