Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2006 Jul;23(7):757-62.
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01914.x.

Comparison of nateglinide and gliclazide in combination with metformin, for treatment of patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on maximum doses of metformin alone

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of nateglinide and gliclazide in combination with metformin, for treatment of patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on maximum doses of metformin alone

S Ristic et al. Diabet Med. 2006 Jul.

Abstract

Aim: To compare the effects of nateglinide plus metformin with gliclazide plus metformin on glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes.

Methods: Double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group, randomized, multicentre study over 24 weeks. Patients with inadequate glucose control on maximal doses of metformin were randomized to additionally receive nateglinide (n = 133) or gliclazide (n = 129). Changes from baseline in HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and mealtime glucose and insulin excursions were examined.

Results: HbA1c was significantly (P < 0.001) decreased from baseline in both treatment groups (mean changes: nateglinide -0.41%, gliclazide -0.57%), but with no significant difference between treatments. Proportions of patients achieving a reduction of HbA1c >or= 0.5% or an end point HbA1c < 7% were also similar (nateglinide 58.1%, gliclazide 60.2%). Changes from baseline in FPG were similarly significant in both treatment groups (nateglinide -0.63, gliclazide -0.82 mmol/l). Reduction from baseline in maximum postprandial glucose excursion were significant in the nateglinide group only (nateglinide -0.71, gliclazide -0.10 mmol/l; P = 0.037 for difference). Postprandial insulin levels were significantly higher with nateglinide compared with gliclazide. The overall rate of hypoglycaemia events was similar in the nateglinide group compared with the gliclazide group.

Conclusions: No significant difference was seen between nateglinide plus metformin and gliclazide plus metformin in terms of HbA1c. However, the nateglinide combination demonstrated better postprandial glucose control.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zimmet P, Alberti KG, Shaw J. Global and societal implications of the diabetes epidemic. Nature. 2001;414:782–787. - PubMed
    1. James DE. MUNC-ing around with insulin action. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:219–221. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ward AJ, Salas M, Caro JJ, Owens D. Health and economic impact of combining metformin with nateglinide to achieve glycemic control: comparison of the lifetime costs of complications in the UK. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2004;2:2–10. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cheng AY, Fantus IG. Oral anti-hyperglycemic therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Can Med Assoc J. 2005;172:213–226. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Garber AJ. Using dose–response characteristics of therapeutic agents for treatment decisions in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2000;2:139–147. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms