Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2006 Jul 16:6:88.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-88.

A systematic review of complex system interventions designed to increase recovery from depression in primary care

Jane Gunn  1 , Justine Diggens, Kelsey Hegarty, Grant Blashki
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

A systematic review of complex system interventions designed to increase recovery from depression in primary care

Jane Gunn et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Primary care is being encouraged to implement multiprofessional, system level, chronic illness management approaches to depression. We undertook this study to identify and assess the quality of RCTs testing system level depression management interventions in primary care and to determine whether these interventions improve recovery.

Method: Searches of Medline and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials. 'System level' interventions included: multi-professional approach, enhanced inter-professional communication, scheduled patient follow-up, structured management plan.

Results: 11 trials met all inclusion criteria. 10 were undertaken in the USA. Most focussed on antidepressant compliance. Quality of reporting assessed using CONSORT criteria was poor. Eight trials reported an increase in the proportion of patients recovered in favour of the intervention group, yet did not account for attrition rates ranging from 5 to 50%.

Conclusion: System level interventions implemented in the USA with patients willing to take anti-depressant medication leads to a modest increase in recovery from depression. The relevance of these interventions to countries with strong primary care systems requires testing in a randomised controlled trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of search for relevant publications.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Murray C, Lopez A. The Global Burden of Disease. Boston, Mass, World Health Organisation and Harvard University Press; 1996.
    1. National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health . National Clinical Practice Guideline Number 23. London, National Institute for Clinical Excellence; 2004. Depression: Management of depression in primary and secondary care.
    1. Proudfoot J, Goldberg D, Mann A, Everitt B, Marks IM, Gray JA. Computerized, interactive, multimedia cognitive-behavioural program for anxiety and depression in general practice. Psychological Medicine. 2003;33:217–227. doi: 10.1017/S0033291702007225. - DOI - PubMed
    1. MacGillivray S, Arroll B, Hatcher S, Ogston S, Reid I, Sullivan F, Williams B, Crombie I. Efficacy and tolerability of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors compared with tricyclic antidepressants in depression treated in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis. [Review] [9 refs] British Medical Journal. 2003;326:10. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Williams JRJ, Mulrow CD, Chiquette E, Noel PH, Aguilar C, Cornell J. A systematic review of newer pharmacotherapies for depression in adults: evidence report summary. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2000;132:743–756. - PubMed

Substances