Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Controlled Clinical Trial
. 2006 Jun;34(6):500-3.

[Magnetocardiography changes in coronary artery disease patients with normal or unspecialized resting electrocardiogram]

[Article in Chinese]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 16842664
Controlled Clinical Trial

[Magnetocardiography changes in coronary artery disease patients with normal or unspecialized resting electrocardiogram]

[Article in Chinese]
Wei-wei Quan et al. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2006 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the magnetocardiography (MCG) changes in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with normal or unspecific changes in resting electrocardiogram (ECG).

Methods: MCG mapping was performed by MCG-7 (MaGIC, Magiscan GmbH) installed in an unshielded room. All patients underwent ECG and coronary angiogram examinations and patients with normal or unspecified ECG changes and coronary artery narrowing > or = 70% in at least 1-vessel were defined as CAD group (n = 120). Patients with normal coronary angiogram served as control (n = 82). Four parameters: ACTM (average classification of total maps), RAM (ratio of abnormal maps), CVEI (complex ventricular excitation index) and R-max/T-max ratio, were analyzed in CAD and control groups.

Results: RAM (62% vs. 35%) and ACTM (2.62 +/- 0.98 vs. 2.29 +/- 0.90, P < 0.05) were significantly higher in CAD group than in control group. CVEI was found in abnormal zone (-100 - 0) in CAD group while in normal zone (0 - 100) in control group. The ratio of Rmax/Tmax in CAD group was also significantly higher in CAD group than in control group (6.41 +/- 3.29 vs. 4.10 +/- 2.00, P < 0.01). ROC curve analysis indicates that RAM, CVEI and Rmax/Tmax ratio were helpful parameters for CAD diagnosis and the diagnostic sensitivity was 67.1%, 65.9% and 64.3%; the specificity was 65.1%, 68.3% and 68.3% respectively.

Conclusion: MCG was a useful tool for diagnosing chronic myocardium ischemia in CAD patients with normal or unspecific changes resting ECG.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Publication types