A comparison of empiric to physician-tailored programming of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: results from the prospective randomized multicenter EMPIRIC trial
- PMID: 16843184
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.03.037
A comparison of empiric to physician-tailored programming of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: results from the prospective randomized multicenter EMPIRIC trial
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this randomized study was to determine whether a strategically chosen standardized set of programmable settings is at least as effective as physician-tailored choices, as measured by the shock-related morbidity of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy.
Background: Programming of ventricular tachyarrhythmia (ventricular tachycardia [VT] or ventricular fibrillation [VF]) detection and therapy for ICDs is complex, requires many choices by highly trained physicians, and directly influences the frequency of shocks and patient morbidity.
Methods: A total of 900 ICD patients were randomly assigned to standardized (EMPIRIC, n = 445) or physician-tailored (TAILORED, n = 455) VT/VF programming and followed for 1 year.
Results: The primary end point was met: the adjusted percentages of both VT/VF (22.3% vs. 28.7%) and supraventricular tachycardia or other non-VT/VF event episodes (11.9% vs. 26.1%) that resulted in a shock were non-inferior and lower in the EMPIRIC arm compared to the TAILORED arm. The time to first all-cause shock was non-inferior in the EMPIRIC arm (hazard ratio = 0.95, 90% confidence interval 0.74 to 1.23, non-inferiority p = 0.0016). The EMPIRIC trial had a significant reduction of patients with 5 or more shocks for all-cause (3.8% vs. 7.0%, p = 0.039) and true VT/VF (0.9% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.018). There were no significant differences in total mortality, syncope, emergency room visits, or unscheduled outpatient visits. Unscheduled hospitalizations occurred significantly less often (p = 0.001) in the EMPIRIC arm.
Conclusions: Standardized empiric ICD programming for VT/VF settings is at least as effective as patient-specific, physician-tailored programming, as measured by many clinical outcomes. Simplified and pre-specified ICD programming is possible without an increase in shock-related morbidity.
Similar articles
-
Strategic programming of detection and therapy parameters in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators reduces shocks in primary prevention patients: results from the PREPARE (Primary Prevention Parameters Evaluation) study.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Aug 12;52(7):541-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.011. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008. PMID: 18687248 Clinical Trial.
-
Predictive value of ventricular arrhythmia inducibility for subsequent ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation in Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT) II patients.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Jan 3;47(1):98-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.08.049. Epub 2005 Dec 15. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006. PMID: 16386671 Clinical Trial.
-
Inductionless or limited shock testing is possible in most patients with implantable cardioverter- defibrillators/cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators: results of the multicenter ASSURE Study (Arrhythmia Single Shock Defibrillation Threshold Testing Versus Upper Limit of Vulnerability: Risk Reduction Evaluation With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantations).Circulation. 2007 May 8;115(18):2382-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.663112. Epub 2007 Apr 30. Circulation. 2007. PMID: 17470697 Clinical Trial.
-
The dilemma of ICD implant testing.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007 May;30(5):675-700. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00730.x. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007. PMID: 17461879 Review.
-
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock reduction using new antitachycardia pacing therapies.Am Heart J. 2007 Apr;153(4 Suppl):44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.01.020. Am Heart J. 2007. PMID: 17394902 Review.
Cited by
-
How to improve outcomes: should we put more emphasis on programming and medical care and less on patient selection?Heart Fail Rev. 2012 Nov;17(6):791-802. doi: 10.1007/s10741-012-9351-x. Heart Fail Rev. 2012. PMID: 23054220 Review.
-
Brazilian Guidelines for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices - 2023.Arq Bras Cardiol. 2023 Jan 23;120(1):e20220892. doi: 10.36660/abc.20220892. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2023. PMID: 36700596 Free PMC article. English, Portuguese. No abstract available.
-
Contemporary management of ventricular arrhythmias in heart failure.Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2023 Aug 15;13(4):207-221. eCollection 2023. Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2023. PMID: 37736352 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A simplified biventricular defibrillator with fixed long detection intervals reduces implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) interventions and heart failure hospitalizations in patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy implanted for primary prevention: the RELEVANT [Role of long dEtection window programming in patients with LEft VentriculAr dysfunction, Non-ischemic eTiology in primary prevention treated with a biventricular ICD] study.Eur Heart J. 2009 Nov;30(22):2758-67. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp247. Epub 2009 Jun 29. Eur Heart J. 2009. PMID: 19567380 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Single-chamber ICD, single-zone therapy in primary and secondary prevention patients: the simpler the better?J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2012 Dec;35(3):343-9. doi: 10.1007/s10840-012-9735-9. Epub 2012 Oct 19. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2012. PMID: 23080327
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous