Optimal sampling sites for repeat prostate biopsy: a recursive partitioning analysis of three-dimensional 26-core systematic biopsy
- PMID: 16843585
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.06.015
Optimal sampling sites for repeat prostate biopsy: a recursive partitioning analysis of three-dimensional 26-core systematic biopsy
Abstract
Objectives: To explore an optimal combination of sampling sites to detect prostate cancer in a repeat biopsy setting.
Methods: A transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic three-dimensional 26-core biopsy (3D26PBx), a combination of transrectal 12 and transperineal 14 core biopsies, was performed in 235 Japanese men with prior negative biopsy. Using recursive partitioning, we evaluated cancer detection of all possible combinations of sampling sites and selected the combination that provides the highest cancer detection rate at a given number of biopsy cores.
Results: Prostate cancer was detected in 87 of the 235 (37%) men. The 3D26PBx improved cancer detection by 89% relative to the conventional transrectal sextant biopsy. Neither Gleason score nor percentage of Gleason 4/5 cancers differed between cancers with and without positive cores within the transrectal sextant-sampling sites. A three-dimensional combination of transrectal and transperineal approaches outperformed either transrectal or transperineal approach alone. Recursive partitioning revealed that a three-dimensional 16-core (transrectal eight cores plus transperineal eight cores) biopsy could detect all the cancers with the minimum number of cores.
Conclusions: We propose a three-dimensional combination of transrectal eight cores taken from the far lateral peripheral zone and the parasagittal base, and transperineal eight cores taken from the anterior and posterior apex and the transition zone as an optimal set of sampling sites for repeat biopsy.
Similar articles
-
The optimal rebiopsy prostatic scheme depends on patient clinical characteristics: results of a recursive partitioning analysis based on a 24-core systematic scheme.Eur Urol. 2011 Oct;60(4):834-41. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.07.036. Epub 2011 Jul 30. Eur Urol. 2011. PMID: 21820797
-
Optimal approach for prostate cancer detection as initial biopsy: prospective randomized study comparing transperineal versus transrectal systematic 12-core biopsy.Urology. 2008 Feb;71(2):191-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.09.029. Urology. 2008. PMID: 18308081 Clinical Trial.
-
Biopsy schemes with the fewest cores for detecting 95% of the prostate cancers detected by a 24-core biopsy.Eur Urol. 2010 Jan;57(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.08.011. Epub 2009 Aug 19. Eur Urol. 2010. PMID: 19720449
-
[Biopsy technique and biopsy schemes for a first series of prostatic biopsies].Prog Urol. 2004 Apr;14(2):144-53. Prog Urol. 2004. PMID: 15217126 Review. French.
-
Current status of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.Clin Radiol. 2006 Feb;61(2):142-53. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2005.10.002. Clin Radiol. 2006. PMID: 16439219 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparative Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy and Complication Rate of Transperineal Versus Transrectal Prostate Biopsy in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 17;17(6):1006. doi: 10.3390/cancers17061006. Cancers (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40149340 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Transperineal template-guided biopsy for diagnosis of prostate cancer in patients with at least two prior negative biopsies.Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2013 Nov;125(21-22):669-73. doi: 10.1007/s00508-013-0421-4. Epub 2013 Sep 24. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2013. PMID: 24061696
-
Random biopsy: when, how many and where to take the cores?World J Urol. 2014 Aug;32(4):859-69. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1335-0. Epub 2014 Jun 8. World J Urol. 2014. PMID: 24908067 Review.
-
Prostate zones and cancer: lost in transition?Nat Rev Urol. 2022 Feb;19(2):101-115. doi: 10.1038/s41585-021-00524-7. Epub 2021 Oct 19. Nat Rev Urol. 2022. PMID: 34667303 Review.
-
When prostate cancer remains undetectable: The dilemma.Turk J Urol. 2015 Mar;41(1):32-8. doi: 10.5152/tud.2015.91249. Turk J Urol. 2015. PMID: 26328196 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous