Ultrahydrophobicity indicates a non-adhesive default state in gecko setae
- PMID: 16845535
- DOI: 10.1007/s00359-006-0149-y
Ultrahydrophobicity indicates a non-adhesive default state in gecko setae
Abstract
Geckos may represent the world's most demanding adhesives application. The adhesive setae on the toes of climbing geckos must adhere strongly yet avoid fouling or attachment at inappropriate times. We tested the hypothesis that gecko setae are non-adhesive in their unloaded default state by comparing the water droplet contact angle (theta) of isolated setal arrays to the smooth surface of eye spectacle scales of tokay geckos (Gekko gecko). At equilibrium, theta was 98.3 +/- 3.4 degrees in spectacle scales of live geckos and 93.3 +/- 3.5 degrees in isolated spectacles. Isolated setal arrays were ultrahydrophobic, with theta of 160.6 +/- 1.3 degrees (means +/- SD). The difference in theta of setal arrays and smooth spectacles indicates a very low contact fraction. Using Cassie's law of surface wettability, we infer that less than 6.6% of the surface of unloaded setae is solid and at least 93.4% is air space. We calculated that the contact fraction must increase from 6.6% in the unloaded state to 46% in the loaded state to account for previously measured values of adhesion. Thus gecko setae may be non-sticky by default because only a very small contact fraction is possible without mechanically deforming the setal array.
Similar articles
-
Effective elastic modulus of isolated gecko setal arrays.J Exp Biol. 2006 Sep;209(Pt 18):3558-68. doi: 10.1242/jeb.02469. J Exp Biol. 2006. PMID: 16943496
-
Frictional adhesion: A new angle on gecko attachment.J Exp Biol. 2006 Sep;209(Pt 18):3569-79. doi: 10.1242/jeb.02486. J Exp Biol. 2006. PMID: 16943497
-
Subdigital setae of narrow-toed geckos, including a Eublepharid (Aeluroscalabotes felinus).Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2008 Jul;291(7):869-75. doi: 10.1002/ar.20706. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2008. PMID: 18484604
-
Whole-organism studies of adhesion in pad-bearing lizards: creative evolutionary solutions to functional problems.J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2006 Nov;192(11):1169-77. doi: 10.1007/s00359-006-0145-2. Epub 2006 Sep 7. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2006. PMID: 16957944 Review.
-
Review: mapping proteins localized in adhesive setae of the tokay gecko and their possible influence on the mechanism of adhesion.Protoplasma. 2018 Nov;255(6):1785-1797. doi: 10.1007/s00709-018-1270-9. Epub 2018 Jun 7. Protoplasma. 2018. PMID: 29881974 Review.
Cited by
-
Beetle adhesive hairs differ in stiffness and stickiness: in vivo adhesion measurements on individual setae.Naturwissenschaften. 2011 May;98(5):381-7. doi: 10.1007/s00114-011-0781-4. Epub 2011 Apr 5. Naturwissenschaften. 2011. PMID: 21465175
-
Dynamic biological adhesion: mechanisms for controlling attachment during locomotion.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019 Oct 28;374(1784):20190199. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0199. Epub 2019 Sep 9. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019. PMID: 31495309 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Revisiting the classification of squamate adhesive setae: historical, morphological and functional perspectives.R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Feb 17;8(2):202039. doi: 10.1098/rsos.202039. R Soc Open Sci. 2021. PMID: 33972877 Free PMC article.
-
Frictional and elastic energy in gecko adhesive detachment.J R Soc Interface. 2008 Mar 6;5(20):339-48. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2007.1077. J R Soc Interface. 2008. PMID: 17567553 Free PMC article.
-
Pushing versus pulling: division of labour between tarsal attachment pads in cockroaches.Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Jun 7;275(1640):1329-36. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1660. Proc Biol Sci. 2008. PMID: 18331984 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources