The effect of perceptual load on attention-induced motion blindness: the efficiency of selective inhibition
- PMID: 16846286
- DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.885
The effect of perceptual load on attention-induced motion blindness: the efficiency of selective inhibition
Abstract
Recent visual marking studies have shown that the carry-over of distractor inhibition can impair the ability of singletons to capture attention if the singleton and distractors share features. The current study extends this finding to first-order motion targets and distractors, clearly separated in time by a visual cue (the letter X). Target motion discrimination was significantly impaired, a result attributed to the carry-over of distractor inhibition. Increasing the difficulty of cue detection increased the motion target impairment, as distractor inhibition is thought to increase under demanding (high load) conditions in order to maximize selection efficiency. The apparent conflict with studies reporting reduced distractor inhibition under high load conditions was resolved by distinguishing between the effects of "cognitive" and "perceptual" load.
((c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).
Similar articles
-
Specifying the distractor inhibition account of attention-induced motion blindness.Vision Res. 2006 Mar;46(6-7):1048-56. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.10.007. Epub 2005 Nov 23. Vision Res. 2006. PMID: 16309728
-
Expectancies modulate attentional capture by salient color singletons.Vision Res. 2008 May;48(11):1315-26. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.02.006. Epub 2008 Apr 14. Vision Res. 2008. PMID: 18407311 Clinical Trial.
-
Multisensory cues capture spatial attention regardless of perceptual load.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Dec;33(6):1311-21. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1311. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007. PMID: 18085945
-
Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load.Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Feb;9(2):75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.004. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005. PMID: 15668100 Review.
-
Attentional capture by auto- and allo-cues.Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Dec;10(4):814-42. doi: 10.3758/bf03196545. Psychon Bull Rev. 2003. PMID: 15000532 Review.
Cited by
-
Event-related potentials of stimuli inhibition and access in cross-modal distractor-induced blindness.PLoS One. 2024 Oct 23;19(10):e0309425. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309425. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39441852 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence inhibition responds reactively to the salience of distracting information during focused attention.PLoS One. 2013 Apr 30;8(4):e62809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062809. Print 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23646147 Free PMC article.
-
Get Set or Get Distracted? Disentangling Content-Priming and Attention-Catching Effects of Background Lure Stimuli on Identifying Targets in Two Simultaneously Presented Series.Brain Sci. 2019 Dec 11;9(12):365. doi: 10.3390/brainsci9120365. Brain Sci. 2019. PMID: 31835694 Free PMC article.
-
Are auditory cues special? Evidence from cross-modal distractor-induced blindness.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Apr;85(3):889-904. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02540-0. Epub 2022 Jul 28. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023. PMID: 35902451 Free PMC article.
-
Signal enhancement and suppression during visual-spatial selective attention.Brain Res. 2010 Nov 4;1359:155-77. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.08.076. Epub 2010 Aug 31. Brain Res. 2010. PMID: 20807513 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources