[Reconstruction of severe acetabular bone defects using Burch-Schneider cage]
- PMID: 16846560
[Reconstruction of severe acetabular bone defects using Burch-Schneider cage]
Abstract
Purpose of the study: The Burch-Schneider cages (BSC) are designed to manage severe acetabular defects by bridging large bone gaps and preventing medial and superior migration of the prosthetic cup. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the results of such revisions after prolonged follow-ups.
Material and methods: From 1985 to 2000 sixty-nine acetabular revisions with BSC were performed in 68 patients with an acetabular defect classified as type Paprosky 3A (32) and 3B (37) at our institutions. After meticulous debridement of the entire acetabulum cancellous chips were pressurized into the bone defects to restore the hemispherical shape. The cage flange for the ischium was then placed after slight contouring into the foramen obturatum or inside the ischium. Finally, the cage was fixed against the ilium with at least three screws. The average age at the time of surgery was 67.9 years (range, 51-78), the mean follow-up equalled 8.3 years (range, 5-20), and the mean Harris hip score was 48 points (range, 29-76). A clinical follow-up study was performed with using conventional measures such as Harris hip score, x-ray analysis, strength of the abductor muscles, and ability to walk without support.
Results: A total of 55 patients (80.9 %) remained without any revision until the latest follow-up. Six components were removed due to aseptic loosening (8.7 %); five for septic loosening (7.2 %), and two revisions had to be performed for recurrent instability (2.9 %). Moreover, there were another six hips definitely or probably loose according to x-ray analysis resulting in a 17.4 % (12/69) rate of aseptic failure. Successful cage re-replacement was achieved only in two cases while the remaining nine hips ended as resection arthroplasties. At the time of follow-up examinations the average Harris hip score was 74 points (range, 51-91), only twelve patients were able to walk without support (12/68, 17.6 %), and insufficiency of the abductor muscles was found in fifteen hips (15/69, 21.7 %). Consolidation of the bone graft was observed in 79.7 % (55/69) of our hips.
Discussion: The severe acetabular bone defect reconstructions have been deteriorating with time as reported by most of the published studies. The results of the current study are no exception. On the other hand, the rate of complications observed in our study was comparable or even lower than in similar studies.
Conclusions: Despite relatively worse results with prolonged follow-ups, the BSC remains a considerable part of the current orthopaedic armamentarium especially when extensive acetabular bone loss is countered. Loosening belongs to the most common complications of the BSC.
Similar articles
-
THA revisions using impaction allografting with mesh is durable for medial but not lateral acetabular defects.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Dec;473(12):3882-91. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4483-7. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015. PMID: 26245166 Free PMC article.
-
[Oblong acetabular cup, type TC, for revision total hip arthroplasty].Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2012;79(6):506-11. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2012. PMID: 23286682 Czech.
-
High placement of an acetabular component inserted without cement in a revision total hip arthroplasty. Results after a mean of ten years.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Apr;81(4):469-80. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199904000-00004. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999. PMID: 10225792
-
The modern Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage for the treatment of acetabular defects: is it still an option? A systematic review.Hip Int. 2023 Jul;33(4):705-715. doi: 10.1177/11207000221099817. Epub 2022 Jun 5. Hip Int. 2023. PMID: 35658595
-
Bone defect determines acetabular revision surgery.Hip Int. 2014 Oct 2;24 Suppl 10:S33-6. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000162. Hip Int. 2014. PMID: 24970036 Review.
Cited by
-
Use of morselized bone allograft in revision hip arthroplasty for massive acetabular defect: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Exp Orthop. 2024 Dec 4;11(4):e70091. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70091. eCollection 2024 Oct. J Exp Orthop. 2024. PMID: 39634575 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Acetabular reconstruction with the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage and bulk allografts: minimum 10-year follow-up results.Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:194076. doi: 10.1155/2014/194076. Epub 2014 May 21. Biomed Res Int. 2014. PMID: 24967339 Free PMC article.
-
Use of structural bone allograft in revision hip arthroplasty for massive acetabular defect: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Exp Orthop. 2025 May 3;12(2):e70241. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70241. eCollection 2025 Apr. J Exp Orthop. 2025. PMID: 40322511 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The management of acetabular malunion with traumatic arthritis by total hip arthroplasty.Pak J Med Sci. 2013 Jan;29(1):191-6. doi: 10.12669/pjms.291.2900. Pak J Med Sci. 2013. PMID: 24353538 Free PMC article.
-
Functional and Emotional Results Differ After Aseptic vs Septic Revision Hip Arthroplasty.HSS J. 2011 Oct;7(3):235-8. doi: 10.1007/s11420-011-9211-6. Epub 2011 Jun 11. HSS J. 2011. PMID: 23024619 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials