Cross-modality of texture and aroma perception is independent of orthonasal or retronasal stimulation
- PMID: 16848539
- DOI: 10.1021/jf060533c
Cross-modality of texture and aroma perception is independent of orthonasal or retronasal stimulation
Abstract
To assess the influence of orthonasal and retronasal stimulation on cross-modal interactions between texture and flavor perception of food, a series of experiments have been conducted. Healthy human subjects were exposed to strawberry aroma pulses delivered by a computer-controlled stimulator based on air dilution olfactometry. Just prior to exposure to the aroma, the human subjects consumed water, custard, or protein gels with different textures without any added aroma. The aroma was delivered as a sequence of aroma pulses, in either an orthonasal or a retronasal fashion. The retronasal presentation of aroma with concomitant presentation of texture is thought to more closely mimick the in vivo flavor release of semisolid food products as compared to orthonasal stimulation. The time between oral consumption of the food, including swallowing, and the exposure to the aroma varied between 0.5 and 6.5 s. The subjects rated the intensity of the strawberry aroma. It was observed that the intensity of aroma decreased with increasing firmness of the food that was consumed. Aroma pulses delivered 6.5 s after swallowing were perceived as being more intense as compared to aroma pulses delivered immediately after swallowing. In conjunction with late delivery, the effect cross-modal interactions apparently decreased. Significantly higher odor intensities were reported for the aroma stimuli supplied orthonasally in comparison to retronasal administration. The observed cross-modal effect of texture on aroma intensity was not significantly altered by the mode of aroma delivery, i.e., orthonasal or retronasal stimulus administration.
Similar articles
-
Investigation of interactions between texture and ortho- and retronasal olfactory stimuli using psychophysical and electrophysiological approaches.Behav Brain Res. 2011 Jan 1;216(1):109-15. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.07.019. Epub 2010 Jul 22. Behav Brain Res. 2011. PMID: 20655335
-
Different Olfactory Percepts Evoked by Orthonasal and Retronasal Odorant Delivery.Chem Senses. 2018 Aug 24;43(7):515-521. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjy043. Chem Senses. 2018. PMID: 29982522
-
Influence of simultaneous gustatory stimuli on orthonasal and retronasal olfaction.Neurosci Lett. 2009 Apr 24;454(2):124-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.03.002. Epub 2009 Mar 5. Neurosci Lett. 2009. PMID: 19429068
-
Factors affecting the ortho- and retronasal perception of flavors: A review.Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2018 Apr 13;58(6):913-923. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2016.1231167. Epub 2017 Jul 5. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2018. PMID: 27646486 Review.
-
Retronasal aroma release and satiation: a review.J Agric Food Chem. 2009 Nov 11;57(21):9888-94. doi: 10.1021/jf901445z. J Agric Food Chem. 2009. PMID: 19817424 Review.
Cited by
-
Sensory Evaluation of E-Liquid Flavors by Smelling and Vaping Yields Similar Results.Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Apr 21;22(5):798-805. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz155. Nicotine Tob Res. 2020. PMID: 31437266 Free PMC article.
-
In Vivo Aroma Release and Dynamic Sensory Perception of Composite Foods.J Agric Food Chem. 2021 Sep 8;69(35):10260-10271. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c02649. Epub 2021 Aug 26. J Agric Food Chem. 2021. PMID: 34435781 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources