Overdiagnosis, sojourn time, and sensitivity in the Copenhagen mammography screening program
- PMID: 16848843
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2006.00272.x
Overdiagnosis, sojourn time, and sensitivity in the Copenhagen mammography screening program
Abstract
The goal of this research was to estimate the overdiagnosis at the first and second screens of the mammography screening program in Copenhagen, Denmark. This study involves a mammography service screening program in Copenhagen, Denmark, with 35,123 women screened at least once. We fit multistate models to the screening data, including preclinical incidence of progressive cancers and nonprogressive (i.e., overdiagnosed) cancers. We estimated mean sojourn time as 2.7 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.2-3.1) and screening test sensitivity as 100% (95% CI 99.8-100). Overdiagnosis was estimated to be 7.8% (95% CI 0.3-26.5) at the first screen and 0.5% (95% CI 0.02-2.1) at the second screen. This corresponds to 4.8% of all cancers diagnosed among participants during the first two invitation rounds and following intervals. A modest overdiagnosis was estimated for the Copenhagen screening program, deriving almost exclusively from the first screen. The CIs were very broad, however, and estimates from larger datasets are warranted.
Similar articles
-
Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.APMIS Suppl. 1998;83:1-44. APMIS Suppl. 1998. PMID: 9850674
-
Age-specific interval breast cancers in New South Wales and meta-analysis of studies of women aged 40-49 years.J Med Screen. 2004;11(4):199-206. doi: 10.1258/0969141042467403. J Med Screen. 2004. PMID: 15563775
-
Estimates of overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer associated with screening mammography.Cancer Causes Control. 2010 Feb;21(2):275-82. doi: 10.1007/s10552-009-9459-z. Epub 2009 Nov 6. Cancer Causes Control. 2010. PMID: 19894130
-
Position paper: breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment in Denmark.Acta Oncol. 2014 Apr;53(4):433-44. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2013.874573. Epub 2014 Feb 5. Acta Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24495043 Review.
-
Overdiagnosis in mammographic screening for breast cancer in Europe: a literature review.J Med Screen. 2012;19 Suppl 1:42-56. doi: 10.1258/jms.2012.012082. J Med Screen. 2012. PMID: 22972810 Review.
Cited by
-
Influence of study features and methods on overdiagnosis estimates in breast and prostate cancer screening.Ann Intern Med. 2013 Jun 4;158(11):831-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-11-201306040-00008. Ann Intern Med. 2013. PMID: 23732716 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Beyond the mammography debate: a moderate perspective.Curr Oncol. 2015 Jun;22(3):220-9. doi: 10.3747/co.22.2585. Curr Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26089721 Free PMC article.
-
Interpreting overdiagnosis estimates in population-based mammography screening.Epidemiol Rev. 2011;33(1):111-21. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxr009. Epub 2011 Jun 27. Epidemiol Rev. 2011. PMID: 21709144 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.Br J Cancer. 2013 Jun 11;108(11):2205-40. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.177. Epub 2013 Jun 6. Br J Cancer. 2013. PMID: 23744281 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Early Mammogram Screening's Impact on Early Breast Cancer Detection in Underserved Populations.Cureus. 2023 Nov 10;15(11):e48616. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48616. eCollection 2023 Nov. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 38084194 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical