Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Sep 22;2(4):365-72.
doi: 10.1098/rsif.2005.0057.

A modelling approach to estimate the sensitivity of pooled faecal samples for isolation of Salmonella in pigs

Affiliations

A modelling approach to estimate the sensitivity of pooled faecal samples for isolation of Salmonella in pigs

Mark E Arnold et al. J R Soc Interface. .

Abstract

The objective of this study was to develop and parametrize a mathematical model of the sensitivity of pooled sampling of faeces to detect Salmonella infection in pigs. A mathematical model was developed to represent the effect of pooling on the probability of Salmonella isolation. Parameters for the model were estimated using data obtained by collecting 50 faecal samples from each of two pig farms. Each sample was tested for Salmonella at individual sample weights of 0.1, 0.5, 1, 10 and 25 g and pools of 5, 10 and 20 samples were created from the individual samples. The highest test sensitivity for individual samples was found at 10 g (90% sensitivity), with the 25 g test sensitivity equal to 83%. For samples of less than 10 g, sensitivity was found to reduce with sample weight. Incubation for 48 h was found to produce a more sensitive test than incubation for 24 h. Model results found increasing sensitivity with more samples in the pool, with the pools of 5, 10 and 20 being more sensitive than individual sampling, and the pools of 20 being the most sensitive of those considered.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the experiments to estimate the sensitivity of pooling of pig faeces for the detection of Salmonella.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The predicted sensitivity of the pooled pen sample from the estimated parameters (solid line) and the proportion of positives from the pooling study (asterisks) for (a) 5×5 g pools, (b) 10×2.5 g pools and (c) 20×1.25 g pools.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The predicted mean test sensitivity of a 25 g pooled pen sample from a pen of 50 pigs when the number of faecal samples in the pool was varied between 1 and 25. Results are given for 7 and 41 pigs infected in the pen, and for the best guess of the national prevalence.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abel U, Schosser R, Suss J. Estimating the prevalence of infectious agents using pooled samples: biometrical considerations. Zentralbl. Bakteriol. 1999;289:550–563. - PubMed
    1. Anon . The Stationery Office; London: 2000. A report of the study of infectious intestinal disease in England.
    1. Anon . Defra; London: 2004. Zoonoses Report United Kingdom 2003.
    1. Armstrong D. Food safety in the British pigmeat production and marketing chain. The Pig J. 2001;47:88–97.
    1. British Pig Executive. Meat & Livestock Commission; Milton Keynes, UK: 2003. ZAP Salmonella update.

Publication types

MeSH terms