Potential sperm donors', recipients' and their partners' opinions towards the release of identifying information in Western Australia
- PMID: 16849591
- DOI: 10.1093/humrep/del274
Potential sperm donors', recipients' and their partners' opinions towards the release of identifying information in Western Australia
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to examine Western Australian potential sperm donors' and recipients' opinions towards the release of identifying information and their intentions to disclose.
Methods: Forty-five potential sperm donors, 33 recipients and 12 partners completed an anonymous questionnaire regarding their opinions on the release of identifying information, whether a child should be told about the manner of their conception, the level of expected contact of donor with future donor offspring and the importance of anonymity in their decision to donate.
Results: Slightly less than one-half (48.9%) of potential donors indicated that they would still donate if their identity was revealed to future offspring. When asked whether they would consider contact with offspring, 80% responded positively, with 42% favouring one-off contact. The majority of recipients (82%) and partners (92%) were planning to inform their offspring about the manner of their conception, with 69% of recipients believing that the offspring should receive identifying information about the donor. Recipients were ambivalent about the level of contact between their offspring and the donor.
Conclusion: These results suggest that the move to an open-identity donor system in Western Australia will benefit the majority of recipient parents who are intending to disclose; however, it also suggests a 50% decline in the number of potential sperm donors.
Similar articles
-
Gamete donors' and recipients' evaluation of donor counselling: a prospective longitudinal cohort study.Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008 Dec;48(6):601-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2008.00925.x. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008. PMID: 19133052
-
Donor information considered important to donors, recipients and offspring: an Australian perspective.Reprod Biomed Online. 2011 Mar;22(3):303-11. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.11.007. Epub 2010 Nov 20. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011. PMID: 21269882
-
[Attitude and considerations of sperm donors in relation to insemination].Ugeskr Laeger. 1995 Aug 7;157(32):4462-5. Ugeskr Laeger. 1995. PMID: 7483027 Danish.
-
[Sperm or oocyte donation: the dynamics of making the decision regarding the method and timing of disclosure of information to the sibling].Harefuah. 2009 Apr;148(4):251-5, 275. Harefuah. 2009. PMID: 19630349 Review. Hebrew.
-
State secrets: access to information under the Human Reproductive Technology Act 1991 (WA).J Law Med. 2002 Feb;9(3):336-46. J Law Med. 2002. PMID: 12194462 Review.
Cited by
-
Beyond motivation: on what it means to be a sperm donor in Denmark.Anthropol Med. 2014;21(2):162-73. doi: 10.1080/13648470.2014.914806. Anthropol Med. 2014. PMID: 25175292 Free PMC article.
-
Sperm donor regulation and disclosure intentions: Results from a nationwide multi-centre study in France.Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2018 Mar 10;5:38-45. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2018.02.001. eCollection 2018 Apr. Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2018. PMID: 29774274 Free PMC article.
-
Conceptualising a child-centric paradigm : do we have freedom of choice in donor conception reproduction?J Bioeth Inq. 2013 Oct;10(3):369-81. doi: 10.1007/s11673-013-9454-7. Epub 2013 Jun 19. J Bioeth Inq. 2013. PMID: 23780686
-
Treating Infertility: Current Affairs of Cross-border Reproductive Care.Open Med (Wars). 2019 Mar 12;14:292-299. doi: 10.1515/med-2019-0026. eCollection 2019. Open Med (Wars). 2019. PMID: 30931395 Free PMC article.
-
Sperm donation and its application in China: a 7-year multicenter retrospective study.Asian J Androl. 2011 Jul;13(4):644-8. doi: 10.1038/aja.2011.20. Epub 2011 May 30. Asian J Androl. 2011. PMID: 21623386 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical