Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Jul-Aug;55(4):267-73.
doi: 10.1097/00006199-200607000-00007.

An online forum as a qualitative research method: practical issues

Affiliations

An online forum as a qualitative research method: practical issues

Eun-Ok Im et al. Nurs Res. 2006 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Background: Despite the positive aspects of online forums as a qualitative research method, very little is known on the practical issues involved in using online forums for data collection, especially for a qualitative research project.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe the practical issues encountered in implementing an online forum as a qualitative component of a larger study on cancer pain experience.

Methods: Throughout the study process, the research staff recorded issues ranging from minor technical problems to serious ethical dilemmas as they arose and wrote memos about them. The memos and written records of the discussions were reviewed and analyzed using content analysis.

Results: Two practical issues related to credibility were identified: (a) a high response and retention rate and (b) automatic transcripts. An issue related to dependability was the participants' forgetfulness. The issues related to confirmability were difficulties in theoretical saturation and unstandardized computer and Internet jargon. A security issue related to hacking attempts was noted as well.

Discussion: The analysis of these issues suggests several implications for future researchers who want to use online forums as a qualitative data collection method.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anderson T, Kanuka H. On-line forums: New platforms for professional development and group collaboration. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication. 1997;3(3) NP.
    1. Burns N. Standards for qualitative research. Nursing Science Quarterly. 1989;2:44–52. - PubMed
    1. Burns N, Grove SK. The practice of nursing research: Conduct, critique, & utilization. 3. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1997. p. 304.
    1. Curl M, Robinson DK. Handheld computers in clinical audit: A comparison with established pen and paper method. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance. 1994;7:16–20. - PubMed
    1. Easton KL, McComish JF, Greenberg R. Avoiding common pitfalls in qualitative data collection and transcription. Qualitative Health Research. 2000;1:703–707. - PubMed

Publication types