Fitness effects of Wolbachia and Spiroplasma in Drosophila melanogaster
- PMID: 16850225
- DOI: 10.1007/s10709-005-3766-4
Fitness effects of Wolbachia and Spiroplasma in Drosophila melanogaster
Abstract
Maternally inherited endosymbionts that manipulate the reproduction of their insect host are very common. Aside from the reproductive manipulation they produce, the fitness of these symbionts depends in part on the direct impact they have on the female host. Although this parameter has commonly been investigated for single infections, it has much more rarely been established in dual infections. We here establish the direct effect of infection with two different symbionts exhibiting different reproductive manipulation phenotypes, both alone and in combination, in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. This species carries a cytoplasmic incompatibility inducing Wolbachia and a male-killing Spiroplasma, occurring as single or double (co-) infections in natural populations. We assessed direct fitness effects of these bacteria on their host, by comparing larval competitiveness and adult fecundity of uninfected, Wolbachia, Spiroplasma and Wolbachia-Spiroplasma co-infected females. We found no effect of infection status on the fitness of females for both estimates, that is, no evidence of any benefits or costs to either single or co-infection. This leads to the conclusion that both bacteria probably have other sources of benefits to persist in D. melanogaster populations, either by means of their reproductive manipulations (fitness compensation from male death in Spiroplasma infection and cytoplasmic incompatibility in Wolbachia infection) or by positive fitness interactions on other fitness components.
Similar articles
-
Variable fitness effects of Wolbachia infection in Drosophila melanogaster.Heredity (Edinb). 2004 Oct;93(4):379-89. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800514. Heredity (Edinb). 2004. PMID: 15305172
-
Association between Wolbachia and Spiroplasma within Drosophila neotestacea: an emerging symbiotic mutualism?Mol Ecol. 2010 Jan;19(2):414-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04448.x. Epub 2009 Nov 30. Mol Ecol. 2010. PMID: 20002580
-
Wolbachia effects in Drosophila melanogaster: in search of fitness benefits.J Invertebr Pathol. 2004 Sep;87(1):45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2004.07.003. J Invertebr Pathol. 2004. PMID: 15491598
-
[Symbiotic bacteria, which modify reproduction processes of Drosophila melanogaster].Mikrobiol Z. 2011 Mar-Apr;73(2):43-52. Mikrobiol Z. 2011. PMID: 21598659 Review. Russian.
-
Wolbachia pipientis: intracellular infection and pathogenesis in Drosophila.Curr Opin Microbiol. 2004 Feb;7(1):67-70. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2003.12.003. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2004. PMID: 15036143 Review.
Cited by
-
Evolution of reproductive parasites with direct fitness benefits.Heredity (Edinb). 2018 Mar;120(3):266-281. doi: 10.1038/s41437-017-0022-5. Epub 2017 Dec 13. Heredity (Edinb). 2018. PMID: 29234159 Free PMC article.
-
High-quality genome of the zoophytophagous stink bug, Nesidiocoris tenuis, informs their food habit adaptation.G3 (Bethesda). 2024 Feb 7;14(2):jkad289. doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkad289. G3 (Bethesda). 2024. PMID: 38113473 Free PMC article.
-
Costs and benefits of Wolbachia infection in immature Aedes albopictus depend upon sex and competition level.J Invertebr Pathol. 2010 Nov;105(3):341-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2010.08.005. Epub 2010 Aug 31. J Invertebr Pathol. 2010. PMID: 20807539 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of feeding on different parts of Ailanthus altissima on the intestinal microbiota of Eucryptorrhynchus scrobiculatus and Eucryptorrhynchus brandti (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).Front Microbiol. 2022 Aug 4;13:899313. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.899313. eCollection 2022. Front Microbiol. 2022. PMID: 35992686 Free PMC article.
-
Stochastic spread of Wolbachia.Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Dec 7;275(1652):2769-76. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0914. Proc Biol Sci. 2008. PMID: 18755670 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases