What do we tell the children? Contrasting the disclosure choices of two HD families regarding risk status and predictive genetic testing
- PMID: 16850280
- DOI: 10.1007/s10897-006-9021-z
What do we tell the children? Contrasting the disclosure choices of two HD families regarding risk status and predictive genetic testing
Abstract
Above all else, predictive genetic testing provides information. Gaining insight into the psychosocial effects of this information is a primary goal of genetic counseling. For individuals utilizing predictive genetic testing, the acquisition of genetic information requires choices regarding disclosure within the family. This study uses a phenomenological methodology to explore the contrasting choices of two sets of HD parents regarding the disclosure of genetic risk status to their children. Additionally, the children (now adults) discuss their lived experience growing up with contrasting disclosure dynamics, and their current views regarding the use of predictive genetic testing for themselves. The primary finding of this study is that all of the adult children now express preference for early disclosure of genetic risk and an open/supportive communication style regarding HD. This finding has value for clinicians working with HD families who must make decisions regarding disclosure issues related to predictive genetic testing.
Similar articles
-
Reverse pre-symptomatic testing for Huntington disease: double disclosure when 25% at-risk children reveal the genetic status to their parent.Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 Jan;27(1):22-27. doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0255-7. Epub 2018 Sep 11. Eur J Hum Genet. 2019. PMID: 30206353 Free PMC article.
-
A hereditary disorder in the family and the family life cycle: Huntington disease as a paradigm.Fam Process. 2002 Winter;41(4):677-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2002.00677.x. Fam Process. 2002. PMID: 12613124
-
Diagnosis of Huntington disease: a model for the stages of psychological response based on experience of a predictive testing program.Am J Med Genet. 1993 Sep 1;47(3):368-74. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320470314. Am J Med Genet. 1993. PMID: 8135283 Review.
-
Attachment in families with Huntington's disease. A paradigm in clinical genetics.Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Oct;63(1-2):246-54. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.11.019. Epub 2006 Jan 20. Patient Educ Couns. 2006. PMID: 16427763
-
Genetic testing and mental health: the model of Huntington disease.Online J Issues Nurs. 2000;5(3):3. Online J Issues Nurs. 2000. PMID: 11380269 Review.
Cited by
-
Ethics in prion disease.Prog Neurobiol. 2013 Nov;110:29-44. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.07.001. Epub 2013 Jul 29. Prog Neurobiol. 2013. PMID: 23906487 Free PMC article.
-
Communication of genetic risk information to daughters in families with fragile X syndrome: the parent's perspective.J Genet Couns. 2011 Feb;20(1):58-69. doi: 10.1007/s10897-010-9326-9. Epub 2010 Sep 28. J Genet Couns. 2011. PMID: 20878219 Free PMC article.
-
Ethics in genetic counselling.J Community Genet. 2019 Jan;10(1):3-33. doi: 10.1007/s12687-018-0371-7. Epub 2018 Jun 14. J Community Genet. 2019. PMID: 29949066 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Role of older generations in the family's adjustment to Huntington disease.J Community Genet. 2021 Jul;12(3):469-477. doi: 10.1007/s12687-021-00523-6. Epub 2021 Mar 25. J Community Genet. 2021. PMID: 33768463 Free PMC article.
-
Genetic risk communication: experiences of adolescent girls and young women from families with fragile X syndrome.J Genet Couns. 2009 Aug;18(4):313-25. doi: 10.1007/s10897-009-9215-2. Epub 2009 Mar 11. J Genet Couns. 2009. PMID: 19277853 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical