Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Jul;43(4):383-91.
doi: 10.1597/05-066.1.

Health professionals' assessment of health-related quality of life values for oral clefting by age using a visual analogue scale method

George L Wehby  1 , Robert L Ohsfeldt, Jeffrey C Murray
Affiliations

Health professionals' assessment of health-related quality of life values for oral clefting by age using a visual analogue scale method

George L Wehby et al. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: To elicit health-related quality of life (HRQL) values associated with oral clefting by age using a visual analogue scale, and to explore the appropriateness of using health professionals as evaluators.

Methods: A representative group of health professionals working on craniofacial and/or cleft palate teams in the United States was sampled. Values (between 0 and 1) representing the HRQL associated with isolated and nonisolated oral clefting for infants, children, adolescents, and adults were obtained. The relationships between selected evaluator characteristics and values were also assessed.

Results: Of 330 professionals surveyed, 133 (40%) completed and returned reliable evaluations. Overall, HRQL values were clustered toward the right tail of the scale, indicating modest decreases in HRQL. Most evaluators reported feeling confident in completing the evaluations. HRQL values seemed to vary by team type (cleft palate only versus cleft palate/craniofacial care) and geographic location, but no major differences were found overall for any selected evaluator characteristics.

Conclusions: This study provides HRQL values for oral clefting based on preferences of health professionals that may be useful in evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of prevention and treatment strategies, including those carried out in clinical trial studies. The clustered pattern of HRQL values suggests either a consensus among evaluators of a limited burden of oral clefting or an overall lack of understanding of the evaluation task.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Visual analogue scale used to obtain HRQL values for oral clefting by age.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bjornsson A, Agustsdottir S. A psychosocial study of Icelandic individuals with cleft lip or cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J. 1987;24:152–157. - PubMed
    1. Boyd NF, Sutherland HJ, Heasman KZ, Tritchler DL, Cummings BJ. Whose utilities for decision analysis? Med Decis Making. 1990;10:58–67. - PubMed
    1. Christensen K, Juel K, Herskind AM, Murray JC. Long-term follow-up study of survival associated with cleft lip and palate at birth. Br Med J. 2004;328:1405–1408. - PMC - PubMed
    1. de Koning HJ, van Ineveld BM, van Oortmarssen GJ, de Haes JC, Collette HJ, Hendriks JH, van der Maas PJ. Breast cancer screening and cost-effectiveness: policy alternatives, quality of life considerations and the possible impact of uncertain factors. Int J Cancer. 1991;49:531–7. - PubMed
    1. Dolan P. Whose preferences count? Med Decis Making. 1999;19:482–486. - PubMed

Publication types