Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Jul 19:6:34.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-34.

Increasing recruitment to randomised trials: a review of randomised controlled trials

Judith M Watson  1 , David J Torgerson
Affiliations

Increasing recruitment to randomised trials: a review of randomised controlled trials

Judith M Watson et al. BMC Med Res Methodol. .

Abstract

Background: Poor recruitment to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is a widespread and important problem. With poor recruitment being such an important issue with respect to the conduct of randomised trials, a systematic review of controlled trials on recruitment methods was undertaken in order to identify strategies that are effective.

Methods: We searched the register of trials in Cochrane library from 1996 to end of 2004. We also searched Web of Science for 2004. Additional trials were identified from personal knowledge. Included studies had to use random allocation and participants had to be allocated to different methods of recruitment to a 'real' randomised trial. Trials that randomised participants to 'mock' trials and trials of recruitment to non-randomised studies (e.g., case control studies) were excluded. Information on the study design, intervention and control, and number of patients recruited was extracted by the 2 authors.

Results: We identified 14 papers describing 20 different interventions. Effective interventions included: telephone reminders; questionnaire inclusion; monetary incentives; using an 'open' rather than placebo design; and making trial materials culturally sensitive.

Conclusion: Few trials have been undertaken to test interventions to improve trial recruitment. There is an urgent need for more RCTs of recruitment strategies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the retrieval of papers included in this review.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison: Effectiveness of strategies to increase recruitment.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison: Open arm of trial compared with blind arm of trial.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Prescott RJ, Counsell CE, Gillespie WJ, Grant AM, Russell IT, Kiauka S, Colthart IR, Ross S, Shepherd SM, Russell D. Factors that limit the quality, number and progress of randomised controlled trials. [Review] Health Technology Assessment Rockville, Md. 1999;3:1–143. - PubMed
    1. Lovato LC, Hill K, Hertert S, Hunninghake DB, Probstfield JL. Recruitment for Controlled Trials: Literature Summary and Annotated Bibliography. Controlled Clinical Trials. 1997;18:328–57. doi: 10.1016/S0197-2456(96)00236-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Puffer S, Torgerson D. Recruitment difficulties in Randomised Controlled Trials. Controlled Clinical Trials. 2003;24:S214–15.
    1. Mapstone J, Elbourne D, Roberts I. Strategies to improve recruitment to research studies. The Cochrane Database of Methodology Reviews. 2002. - PubMed
    1. Avenell A, Grant AM, McGee , McPherson G, Campbell MK, McGee MA. The effects of an open design on trial participant recruitment, compliance and retention – a randomized controlled trial comparison with a blinded, placebo-controlled design. Clinical Trials. 2004;1:1–9. doi: 10.1191/1740774504cn053oa. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources