Covering the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube prevents peristomal infection
- PMID: 16855804
- DOI: 10.1007/s00268-005-0628-2
Covering the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube prevents peristomal infection
Abstract
Background: Because oropharyngeal bacteria can be brought through the abdominal wall during percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), peristomal infection is one of the most frequent complications in patients who undergo the procedure. This study aimed to determine whether covering the PEG tube with a sheath that could be detached in the stomach could help prevent peristomal infection.
Methods: In three community hospitals in Japan, data from 449 patients with swallowing dysfunction were prospectively collected between March 2000 and February 2002 for non-covered PEG (n=206) and between March 2002 and February 2004 for covered PEG (n=243).
Results: After adjusting for hospital, age, gender, and underlying diseases, covering the PEG significantly reduced peristomal purulent infection compared with non-covered PEG (odds ratio: 0.05; 95% confidence interval: 0.02-0.13). Body temperature, white blood cell count, and C-reactive protein at day 3 after PEG placement, as well as duration of antibiotics usage, were significantly lower or shorter in patients treated with covered PEG than non-covered PEG. In spite of the same frequencies in the two groups of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in oropharyngeal cultures before PEG placement, these organisms were detected significantly less frequently in peristomal lesions of patients who underwent covered PEG. Moreover, 28 patients treated with covered PEG received no antibiotic therapy, and 27 of them had no signs of peristomal infection.
Conclusions: These results suggest that covering the PEG tube, with or without providing antibiotic therapy, may prevent peristomal infection in spite of the presence of oropharyngeal bacterial flora after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.
Similar articles
-
Peristomal infection after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a 7-year surveillance of 297 patients.Arq Gastroenterol. 2012 Dec;49(4):255-8. doi: 10.1590/s0004-28032012000400005. Arq Gastroenterol. 2012. PMID: 23329219
-
Reduced risk of peristomal infection of direct percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in cancer patients: comparison with the pull percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy procedure.J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Nov;207(5):737-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.06.335. Epub 2008 Aug 9. J Am Coll Surg. 2008. PMID: 18954787
-
Nasopharyngeal decolonization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus can reduce PEG peristomal wound infection.Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Feb;101(2):274-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00366.x. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006. PMID: 16454830 Clinical Trial.
-
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy: A Practical Overview on Its Indications, Placement Conditions, Management, and Nursing Care.Gastroenterol Nurs. 2015 Sep-Oct;38(5):354-66; quiz 367-8. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0000000000000150. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2015. PMID: 26422269 Review.
-
Antibiotic prophylaxis for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in pediatric patients: a meta-analysis.Pediatr Surg Int. 2022 Dec 25;39(1):63. doi: 10.1007/s00383-022-05355-0. Pediatr Surg Int. 2022. PMID: 36574093 Review.
Cited by
-
Prophylactic antibiotic guidelines in modern interventional radiology practice.Semin Intervent Radiol. 2010 Dec;27(4):327-37. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1267853. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2010. PMID: 22550374 Free PMC article.
-
Airway infection predisposes to peristomal infection after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with high concordance between sputum and wound isolates.J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Jan;14(1):45-51. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-1058-5. Epub 2009 Oct 9. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010. PMID: 19816746
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials