Intentionally hastening death by withholding or withdrawing treatment
- PMID: 16855920
- DOI: 10.1007/s00508-006-0583-4
Intentionally hastening death by withholding or withdrawing treatment
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to provide empirical data on physicians' intentions in withholding and withdrawing treatment, and to discuss possible implications for the ethical debate.
Basic procedures: The data presented come from EURELD, a large research project designed to investigate medical end-of-life decisions in six European countries. A continuous random sample of death certificates formed the basis for contacting doctors who had attended the deceased; the doctors were asked to complete, strictly anonymously, mail questionnaires on the decisions taken at the end of their patients' lives.
Main findings: In the six countries studied, physicians reported they had the explicit intention of hastening the end of life in 45% of all treatments that were withheld/ withdrawn. The highest numbers of cases with an underlying intention of hastening the end of life were found in Switzerland and Sweden (52% and 51%, respectively); the lowest figures came from Denmark and Belgium (36% and 38%). Middle-ranking countries were Italy (42%) and the Netherlands (45%). Overall, dialysis and respiration were comparatively more often forgone with the explicit intent to hasten the end of life (57% and 54%, respectively), whereas a particularly low percentage of cases with such an explicit intention was found for oncotherapy (34%).
Principal conclusions: In almost every second case, a medical decision to withhold or withdraw treatment is taken with the explicit intention of hastening the end of the patient's life. No clear association can be found between the intent to hasten the end of life and features of the treatment forgone that can be determined objectively, such as the likelihood and extent of a life-shortening effect, the immediacy of death, or the expected burden of any potential life-sustaining measure. The findings of the study challenge the usefulness of doctors' intentions with regard to hastening the end of life as criteria for moral judgements on decisions to withhold or withdraw medical treatment.
Similar articles
-
End-of-life decisions for children under 1 year of age in the Netherlands: decreased frequency of administration of drugs to deliberately hasten death.J Med Ethics. 2015 Oct;41(10):795-8. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102562. Epub 2015 Aug 13. J Med Ethics. 2015. PMID: 26272986
-
[Forgoing life-sustaining measures in patients at the end of life in the German-speaking part of Switzerland: results of a death certificate study].Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2005 Dec 16;130(50):2887-92. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-923321. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2005. PMID: 16342012 German.
-
Hastening death in end-of-life care: a survey of doctors.Soc Sci Med. 2009 Dec;69(11):1659-66. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.025. Epub 2009 Oct 17. Soc Sci Med. 2009. PMID: 19837498
-
First do no harm: intentionally shortening lives of patients without their explicit request in Belgium.J Med Ethics. 2015 Aug;41(8):625-9. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102387. Epub 2015 Jun 3. J Med Ethics. 2015. PMID: 26041861 Review.
-
Withholding and withdrawing life support in critical care settings: ethical issues concerning consent.J Med Ethics. 2007 Apr;33(4):215-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.017038. J Med Ethics. 2007. PMID: 17400619 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia in the ICU: A Dialogue on Core Ethical Issues.Crit Care Med. 2017 Feb;45(2):149-155. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001818. Crit Care Med. 2017. PMID: 28098622 Free PMC article.
-
[Limiting or withholding treatment: the principal of "primum nihil nocere"].Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2006 Jun;118(11-12):309-11. doi: 10.1007/s00508-006-0605-2. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2006. PMID: 16855917 German. No abstract available.
-
End-of-life discontinuation of destination therapy with cardiac and ventilatory support medical devices: physician-assisted death or allowing the patient to die?BMC Med Ethics. 2010 Sep 15;11:15. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-11-15. BMC Med Ethics. 2010. Retraction in: BMC Med Ethics. 2010 Dec 21;11:20. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-11-20. PMID: 20843327 Free PMC article. Retracted.
-
Could palliative sedation be seen as unnamed euthanasia?: a survey among healthcare professionals in oncology.BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Jul 19;22(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01219-z. BMC Palliat Care. 2023. PMID: 37468913 Free PMC article.
-
Limiting treatment and shortening of life: data from a cross-sectional survey in Germany on frequencies, determinants and patients' involvement.BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Jan 17;16(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0176-6. BMC Palliat Care. 2017. PMID: 28095908 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical