Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Jul 1;40(13):4226-32.
doi: 10.1021/es052477m.

Modeling particle exposure in U.S. trucking terminals

Affiliations

Modeling particle exposure in U.S. trucking terminals

M E Davis et al. Environ Sci Technol. .

Abstract

Multi-tiered sampling approaches are common in environmental and occupational exposure assessment, where exposures for a given individual are often modeled based on simultaneous measurements taken at multiple indoor and outdoor sites. The monitoring data from such studies is hierarchical by design, imposing a complex covariance structure that must be accounted for in order to obtain unbiased estimates of exposure. Statistical methods such as structural equation modeling (SEM) represent a useful alternative to simple linear regression in these cases, providing simultaneous and unbiased predictions of each level of exposure based on a set of covariates specific to the exposure setting. We test the SEM approach using data from a large exposure assessment of diesel and combustion particles in the U.S.trucking industry. The exposure assessment includes data from 36 different trucking terminals across the United States sampled between 2001 and 2005, measuring PM2.5 and its elemental carbon (EC), organic carbon (OC) components, by personal monitoring, and sampling at two indoor work locations and an outdoor "background" location. Using the SEM method, we predict the following: (1) personal exposures as a function of work-related exposure and smoking status; (2) work-related exposure as a function of terminal characteristics, indoor ventilation, job location, and background exposure conditions; and (3) background exposure conditions as a function of weather, nearby source pollution, and other regional differences across terminal sites. The primary advantage of SEMs in this setting is the ability to simultaneously predict exposures at each of the sampling locations, while accounting for the complex covariance structure among the measurements and descriptive variables. The statistically significant results and high R2 values observed from the trucking industry application supports the broader use of this approach in exposure assessment modeling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Schenker MB. Diesel exhaust - an occupational carcinogen? Journal of Occupational Medicine. 1980;22:41–46. - PubMed
    1. Bhatia R, Lopipero P, Smith AH. Diesel exhaust exposure and lung cancer. Epidemiology. 1998;9:84–91. - PubMed
    1. Lipsett M, Campleman S. Occupational exposure to diesel exhaust and lung cancer: a meta-analysis . Am J Public Health. 1999;89:1009–1017. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stayner L, Bailer AJ, Smith R, Gilbert S, Rice F, Kuempel E. Sources of uncertainty in dose-response modeling of epidemiological data for cancer risk assessment . Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;895:212–22. - PubMed
    1. IARC. Diesel and gasoline engine exhausts and some nitroarenes. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 1989. Online source: http://www-cie.iarc.fr/htdocs/monographs/vol46/46-01.htm. - PubMed

Publication types