Identifying barriers to prehospital thrombolysis in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction
- PMID: 16858108
- PMCID: PMC2564177
- DOI: 10.1136/emj.2005.033993
Identifying barriers to prehospital thrombolysis in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction
Abstract
Background and objectives: After an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) prehospital thrombolysis (PHT) reduces mortality compared with inhospital thrombolysis. In practice, a relatively small proportion of the total population with AMI receives PHT. This study was designed to identify the current barriers to PHT.
Methods: A retrospective practice review of 57 consecutive patients treated in or before arrival at a district general hospital emergency department. All patients received thrombolysis for an AMI.
Results: The main barriers to delivery of PHT appear to be the inclusion and exclusion criteria laid out in the ambulance service central guidelines. Despite recent widening of the inclusion criteria, 54% of patients eligible for immediate treatment on arrival in hospital either received or were eligible for PHT.
Conclusion: To increase the number of patients who are eligible for PHT these guidelines need to be revised further in line with inhospital criteria for thrombolysis.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: none declared
Similar articles
-
Prehospital management of acute myocardial infarction: Electrocardiogram acquisition and interpretation, and thrombolysis by prehospital care providers.Can J Cardiol. 1998 Oct;14(10):1231-40. Can J Cardiol. 1998. PMID: 9852937 Review.
-
[Prehospital management of acute myocardial infarct in an experimental metropolitan system of medical emergencies].G Ital Cardiol. 1996 Jun;26(6):657-72. G Ital Cardiol. 1996. PMID: 8803587 Italian.
-
What percentages of patients are suitable for prehospital thrombolysis?Emerg Med J. 2006 Jun;23(6):444-5. doi: 10.1136/emj.2005.026450. Emerg Med J. 2006. PMID: 16714504 Free PMC article.
-
Retrospective observational case-control study comparing prehospital thrombolytic therapy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction with in-hospital thrombolytic therapy for patients from same area.Emerg Med J. 2005 Aug;22(8):582-5. doi: 10.1136/emj.2004.020271. Emerg Med J. 2005. PMID: 16046765 Free PMC article.
-
Prehospital versus hospital fibrinolytic therapy using automated versus cardiologist electrocardiographic diagnosis of myocardial infarction: abortion of myocardial infarction and unjustified fibrinolytic therapy.Am Heart J. 2004 Mar;147(3):509-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.10.007. Am Heart J. 2004. PMID: 14999202 Review.
Cited by
-
Paramedics beliefs and attitudes towards pre-hospital thrombolysis.Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2014 Jan;4(1):11-5. doi: 10.4103/2229-516X.125672. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2014. PMID: 24600571 Free PMC article.
-
Looking back to inform the future: a review of published paramedicine research.BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb 2;23(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08893-4. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023. PMID: 36732779 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pre-hospital ECG E-transmission for patients with suspected myocardial infarction in the highlands of Scotland.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Feb 21;11(2):2346-60. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110202346. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014. PMID: 24566058 Free PMC article.
References
-
- [No authors listed] Reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction. Drug Ther Bull 20054349–53. - PubMed
-
- [No authors listed] The pre‐hospital management of acute heart attacks. Recommendations of a Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Resuscitation Council. Eur Heart J 1998191140–1164. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical