Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Aug;244(2):260-4.
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000217606.59625.9d.

Perihepatic lymph node assessment in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy for malignancy

Affiliations

Perihepatic lymph node assessment in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy for malignancy

Stephen R Grobmyer et al. Ann Surg. 2006 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the value of preoperative imaging studies and the intraoperative assessment of perihepatic lymph nodes in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy for malignancy.

Summary background data: Perihepatic lymph node status is an important prognostic factor for patients undergoing hepatic resection for 1(o) and metastatic cancer. The value of preoperative imaging studies and intraoperative assessment of perihepatic nodes is unknown.

Methods: Perihepatic lymph nodes were sampled in 100 patients undergoing resection for 1(o) and metastatic hepatic malignancy. At the time of sampling, participating surgeons assigned a clinical suspicion score (scale, 1-5: 1 = clinically negative, 5 = clinically positive). Preoperative CT scans and PET scans were reviewed in a blinded fashion by 2 radiologists. Clinical assessment, CT, and PET scan results were analyzed in the context of the pathologic status of the lymph nodes.

Results: A mean of 3.2 +/- 0.2 nodes were sampled per patient. Fifteen patients had metastatic disease in perihepatic lymph nodes; 13 had suggestive findings on preoperative CT or PET, and 2 were clinically positive at exploration. Clinical assessment had a high negative predictive value (NPV) = 99% but a low positive predictive value (PPV) = 39%. Similarly, CT scans had a high NPV = 95% and a low PPV = 30%. PET scans had a NPV = 88% and a PPV of 100%. Of the 48 patients with both negative preoperative CT and PET scans, only 1 (2.1%) had metastatic nodal disease, and this was suspected based on the clinical assessment. Of the patients with negative CT and PET scans and a negative clinical assessment (n = 39), none had involved perihepatic nodes.

Conclusions: In patients with 1(o) and metastatic liver cancer, the incidence of truly occult metastatic disease to perihepatic lymph nodes is low. Routine sampling of perihepatic lymph nodes will therefore have a low yield in patients without some evidence of disease on preoperative CT or PET scans or at the time of exploration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
FIGURE 1. Schematic diagram showing lymph node groups sampled.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Uenishi T, Hirohashi K, Shuto T, et al. The clinical significance of lymph node metastases in patients undergoing surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma. Surg Today. 2000;30:892–895. - PubMed
    1. Chu KM, Lai EC, Al-Hadeedi S, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg. 1997;21:301–305. - PubMed
    1. Valverde A, Bonhomme N, Farges O, et al. Resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a Western experience. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 1999;6:122–127. - PubMed
    1. Resection of the liver for colorectal carcinoma metastases: a multi-institutional study of indications for resection. Registry of Hepatic Metastases. Surgery. 1988;103:278–288. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beckurts KT, Holscher AH, Thorban S, et al. Significance of lymph node involvement at the hepatic hilum in the resection of colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg. 1997;84:1081–1084. - PubMed

MeSH terms