Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006;21(7):529-35.
doi: 10.1007/s10654-006-9030-0. Epub 2006 Jul 21.

Paternal occupational exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and risk of adverse pregnancy outcome

Affiliations

Paternal occupational exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and risk of adverse pregnancy outcome

Geir Mjøen et al. Eur J Epidemiol. 2006.

Abstract

Background: During the last decades, public concern that radiofrequency radiation (RFR) may be related to adverse reproductive outcomes has been emerging. Our objective was to assess associations between paternal occupational exposure to RFR and adverse pregnancy outcomes including birth defects using population-based data from Norway.

Methods: Data on reproductive outcomes derived from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway were linked with data on paternal occupation derived from the general population censuses. An expert panel categorized occupations according to exposure. Using logistic regression, we analyzed 24 categories of birth defects as well as other adverse outcomes.

Results: In the offspring of fathers most likely to have been exposed, increased risk was observed for preterm birth (odds ratio (OR): 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03, 1.15). In this group we also observed a decreased risk of cleft lip (OR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.41, 0.97). In the medium exposed group, we observed increased risk for a category of "other defects" (OR: 2.40, 95% CI: 1.22, 4.70), and a decreased risk for a category of "other syndromes" (OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.99) and upper gastrointestinal defects (OR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.40, 0.93).

Conclusion: The study is partly reassuring for occupationally exposed fathers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Diabetes Care. 2001 Jul;24(7):1151-5 - PubMed
    1. Teratology. 1996 Dec;54(6):305-13 - PubMed
    1. Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Dec;112(17):1741-54 - PubMed
    1. Epidemiology. 1995 Nov;6(6):577-83 - PubMed
    1. Patient Educ Couns. 1996 Jun;28(1):25-30 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources