Can U.S. GI fellowship programs meet American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy recommendations for training in EUS? A survey of U.S. GI fellowship program directors

Abstract

Background: American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) EUS training and credentialing guidelines exist, but the capability of U.S. GI fellowships to meet these guidelines has not been assessed.

Objective: To ascertain the capability of U.S. GI fellowship programs to meet ASGE guidelines for EUS training in the context of 3-year and advanced GI fellowships.

Methods: U.S. GI fellowship programs were surveyed for the presence or the absence, type, and extent of EUS training. Demographics regarding the programs and the program directors were obtained.

Main outcome measurements: Data on the annual total EUS volume and data on EUS performed by 3-year and/or advanced-year fellows were collected and analyzed.

Results: Ninety-one of 142 contactable GI programs responded (64%); 72% of programs performed >200 EUS/y and thus could train >or=1 EUS trainee/y. For 3-year GI fellows, 55% received less than 3 months of training, with 43% not receiving actual "hands-on" EUS experience, and 61% not learning EUS-guided FNA. The median EUS performed by 3-year fellows was 50 (0-350). Programs that offer advanced endoscopy fellowship had a median advanced-trainee EUS volume of 200 procedures (range, 50-1100 procedures). Of advanced fellows, 20% failed to receive "hands-on" training and 52% performed <200 procedures. We observed a significant difference in the median EUS volume performed by 3-year versus advanced-year fellows (P<.001). Program director variables did not correlate with training EUS volumes.

Conclusions: The majority of U.S. GI fellowship programs have established the EUS volume to train at least 1 EUS fellow, per ASGE guidelines; however, most 3-year and many advanced fellows are currently receiving insufficient EUS training.