The use of microimplants in orthodontic anchorage
- PMID: 16860211
- DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.04.016
The use of microimplants in orthodontic anchorage
Abstract
Purpose: Various types of temporary implants have been introduced to serve as orthodontic anchorage. The hypothesis of this study is that microimplants of 1.2 mm diameter can be used as orthodontic anchors, and that their success is related to their length. The aim of this study is to determine the incidence of anchor retention after orthodontic force application for moving teeth, and to determine the relationship of microimplant length to retention rate.
Methods: Fifty-nine microimplants (diameter: 1.2 mm) were placed in 29 patients as orthodontic anchorages. After 2 weeks of microimplant placement, a force of 100 to 200 g was loaded with an elastometric chain or NiTi coil spring. Risk factors were characterized as to why a microimplant may fail, and Fisher's exact test was used for statistical analysis.
Results: Nine microimplants were removed and the overall success rate was 84.7%. Exploring the causes for failure, we found significant differences between the length of microimplants and success rate; 6 mm was 72.2% and 8 mm was 90.2%.
Conclusions: The results suggest that microimplants are suited as an alternative orthodontic anchorage. We recommend that 8-mm microimplants are preferable to 6-mm.
Similar articles
-
Clinical and histologic analysis of the stability of microimplants with immediate orthodontic loading in dogs.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Aug;136(2):260-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.10.046. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009. PMID: 19651357
-
Factors associated with the stability of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage: a study of 414 samples in Taiwan.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Aug;67(8):1595-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.015. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009. PMID: 19615569
-
Factors affecting the clinical success of screw implants used as orthodontic anchorage.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Jul;130(1):18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.11.032. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006. PMID: 16849067
-
The use of miniscrew implants for temporary skeletal anchorage in orthodontics: a comprehensive review.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 May;103(5):e6-15. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.11.022. Epub 2007 Feb 21. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007. PMID: 17317235 Review.
-
[Adult orthodontics. Anchorage in the adult].Orthod Fr. 2011 Mar;82(1):95-106. doi: 10.1051/orthodfr/2011100. Epub 2011 Apr 4. Orthod Fr. 2011. PMID: 21457697 Review. French. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Ridge mini-implants, a versatile biomechanical anchorage device whose success is significantly enhanced by splinting: a clinical report.Prog Orthod. 2023 Aug 28;24(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s40510-023-00480-5. Prog Orthod. 2023. PMID: 37635155 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effectiveness of methods for detaching orthodontic implants likely to fracture upon rotational torque - an animal study.Clin Exp Dent Res. 2016 Feb 9;2(1):51-56. doi: 10.1002/cre2.20. eCollection 2016 Jun. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2016. PMID: 29744149 Free PMC article.
-
The perception of pain following interdental microimplant treatment for skeletal anchorage: a retrospective study.Odontology. 2011 Jan;99(1):88-91. doi: 10.1007/s10266-010-0152-1. Epub 2011 Jan 27. Odontology. 2011. PMID: 21271332
-
Fracture resistance of commonly used self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants.Angle Orthod. 2015 Jan;85(1):26-32. doi: 10.2319/112213-860.1. Angle Orthod. 2015. PMID: 24869900 Free PMC article.
-
Measurement of mini-implant stability using resonance frequency analysis.Angle Orthod. 2013 Mar;83(2):230-8. doi: 10.2319/043012-354.1. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Angle Orthod. 2013. PMID: 22931201 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources