Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2006 Jul 29;333(7561):228.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.38887.558576.7C. Epub 2006 Jul 21.

A cost effectiveness analysis within a randomised controlled trial of post-acute care of older people in a community hospital

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A cost effectiveness analysis within a randomised controlled trial of post-acute care of older people in a community hospital

Jacqueline O'Reilly et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess the cost effectiveness of post-acute care for older people in a locality based community hospital compared with a department for care of elderly people in a district general hospital, which admits patients aged over 76 years with acute medical conditions.

Design: Cost effectiveness analysis within a randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Community hospital and district general hospital in Yorkshire, England.

Participants: 220 patients needing rehabilitation after an acute illness for which they required admission to hospital.

Interventions: Multidisciplinary care in the district general hospital or prompt transfer to the community hospital.

Main outcome measures: EuroQol EQ-5D scores transformed into quality adjusted life years (QALYs), and health and social service costs over six months from randomisation.

Results: The mean QALY score for the community hospital group was marginally non-significantly higher than that for the district general hospital group (0.38 v 0.35) at six months after recruitment. The mean (standard deviation) costs per patient of the health and social services resources used were similar for both groups: community hospital group 7233 pounds sterling (euros 10,567; 13,341 dollars) (5031 pounds sterling), district general hospital group 7351 pounds sterling(6229 pounds sterling), and these findings were robust to several sensitivity analyses. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio for community hospital care dominated. A cost effectiveness acceptability curve, based on bootstrapped simulations, suggests that at a willingness to pay threshold of 10,000 pounds sterling per QALY, 51% of community hospital cases will be cost effective, which rises to 53% of cases when the threshold is 30,000 pounds sterling per QALY.

Conclusion: Post-acute care for older people in a locality based community hospital is of similar cost effectiveness to that of an elderly care department in a district general hospital.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Representation of cost effectiveness plane on basis of bootstrap simulation (based on 1000 replications)
Fig 2
Fig 2
Cost effectiveness acceptability curve for older patients admitted to a community hospital compared with a district general hospital for rehabilitation (based on 1000 replications)

References

    1. Department of Health. Creating a patient-led NHS: delivering the NHS improvement plan. London: DoH, 2005.
    1. Department of Health. The NHS plan. London: DoH, 2000.
    1. Griffiths P, Wilson-Barnet J, Richardson G, Spilsbury K, Miller F, Harris R. The effectiveness of intermediate care in a nursing-led in-patient unit. Int J Nurs Stud 2000;37: 153-61. - PubMed
    1. Steiner A, Walsh B, Pickering RM, Wiles R, Ward J, Brooking J. Therapeutic nursing or unblocking beds? A randomised controlled trial of a post-acute intermediate care unit. BMJ 2001;322: 453-60. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Griffiths P, Harris R, Richardson G, Hallett N, Heard S, Wilson-Barnett J. Substitution of a nurse led inpatient unit for acute services: a randomised controlled trial of outcomes and costs of nurse-led intermediate care. Age Ageing 2001;30: 483-8. - PubMed

Publication types