Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2007 Feb;9(1):14-22.
doi: 10.1016/j.jfms.2006.05.009. Epub 2006 Jul 24.

Evaluation of a novel nested PCR for the routine diagnosis of feline leukemia virus (FeLV) and feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV)

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evaluation of a novel nested PCR for the routine diagnosis of feline leukemia virus (FeLV) and feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV)

Alvaro Arjona et al. J Feline Med Surg. 2007 Feb.

Abstract

Laboratory diagnosis of feline leukemia virus (FeLV) and feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) usually involves both viruses, as the clinical signs are similar and coinfection may occur. Serological methods may not represent an accurate diagnosis: maternal antibodies or cross-reactions may give false positive results to FIV, and false negative results may occur in latent FeLV status, or in certain FIV infection stages. A nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique was designed to detect FeLV, FIV and feline endogenous retrovirus simultaneously. The detection of endogenous sequences was considered indicative of successful DNA extraction. The technique was used to diagnose FIV and FeLV in the blood cells of 179 cats. The kappa value with the serological data was 0.69 for FeLV and 0.87 for FIV. The joint detection of FeLV and FIV by this novel nested PCR is sensitive, specific, fast and convenient, and its applicability for clinical diagnosis is promising, as the direct evidence of the presence of the virus is more realistic than the indirect data provided by the serological detection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Optimization of the number of cycles for the first and second PCR reactions. For the first PCR reaction, the number of cycles is read across and for the second it is read down. The positions of the bands of 1138 bp corresponding to FIV, 306 bp to FeLV and 257 bp to the feline endogenous retroviruses are shown. Lanes 1, 105 Ho6 (FIV infected) cells; lanes 2, 105 FL-74 (FeLV infected) cells; lanes 3, 105 CRFK (feline endogenous retroviruses control) cells; lanes 4, 107 U937 (negative control of DNA) cells; and lanes 5, double distilled water.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Optimization of the time of extension at 72°C for the first and second PCR reactions. For the first PCR reaction, the time is read across and for the second it is read down. The positions of the bands of 1138 bp corresponding to FIV, 306 bp to FeLV and 257 bp to the feline endogenous retroviruses are shown. Lanes 1, 106 FL-74 (FeLV infected) cells; lanes 2, 103 FL-74 cells; lanes 3, 106 Ho6 (FIV infected) cells; lanes 4, 103 Ho6 cells; lanes 5, 106 CRFK (feline endogenous sequences control) cells; and lanes 6, double distilled water.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Assay of sensitivity. Samples were amplified using 35 cycles for the first PCR reaction and 25 for the second. Extension was performed at 72°C for 3 min in the first PCR reaction, and 90 s in the second PCR reaction. The position of the bands of 1138 bp corresponding to FIV, 306 bp to FeLV and 257 bp to the feline endogenous retroviruses is shown. Lane 1, 106 FL-74 (FeLV infected) cells; lane 2, 105 FL-74 cells; lane 3, 104 FL-74 cells; lane 4, 103 FL-74 cells; lane 5, 102 FL-74 cells; lane 6, 10 FL-74 cells; lane 7, one FL-74 cell; lane 8, FeLV DNA control; lane 9, CRFK (endogenous retroviruses control); lane 10, double distilled water; lane 11, 100 kb DNA ladder; lane 12, 106 Ho6 (FIV infected) cells; lane 13, 105 Ho6 cells; lane 14, 104 Ho6 cells; lane 15, 103 Ho6 cells; lane 16, 102 Ho6 cells; lane 17, 10 Ho6 cells; lane 18, 1 Ho6 cell; lane 19, FIV DNA control; and lane 20, double distilled water.

References

    1. Andersen P.R., Tyrrell P. Feline immunodeficiency virus diagnosis after vaccination, Animal Health and Research Reviews 5, 2004, 327–330. - PubMed
    1. Arjona A., Escolar I., Soto I., Barquero N., Martín D., Gomez-Lucia E. Seroepidemiological survey of infection by feline leukemia virus and feline immunodeficiency virus in Madrid. Correlation with some clinical aspects, Journal of Clinical Mirobiology 38, 2000, 3448–3449. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bandecchi P., Matteucci D., Baldinotti F., Guidi G., Abramo F., Tozzini F., Bendinelli M. Prevalence of feline immunodeficiency virus and other retroviral infections in sick cats in Italy, Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 31, 1992, 337–345. - PubMed
    1. Barr M.C. FIV, FeLV, and FIPV: interpretation and misinterpretation of serological test results, Seminars in Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (Small Animals) 11, 1996, 144–153. - PubMed
    1. Barr M.C., Pough M.B., Jacobson R.H., Scott F.W. Comparison and interpretation of diagnostic tests for feline immunodeficiency virus infection, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 199, 1991, 1377–1381. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources