Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 Jun 16;8(2):e9.
doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.2.e9.

eHealth Literacy: Essential Skills for Consumer Health in a Networked World

Affiliations
Review

eHealth Literacy: Essential Skills for Consumer Health in a Networked World

Cameron D Norman et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Electronic health tools provide little value if the intended users lack the skills to effectively engage them. With nearly half the adult population in the United States and Canada having literacy levels below what is needed to fully engage in an information-rich society, the implications for using information technology to promote health and aid in health care, or for eHealth, are considerable. Engaging with eHealth requires a skill set, or literacy, of its own. The concept of eHealth literacy is introduced and defined as the ability to seek, find, understand, and appraise health information from electronic sources and apply the knowledge gained to addressing or solving a health problem. In this paper, a model of eHealth literacy is introduced, comprised of multiple literacy types, including an outline of a set of fundamental skills consumers require to derive direct benefits from eHealth. A profile of each literacy type with examples of the problems patient-clients might present is provided along with a resource list to aid health practitioners in supporting literacy improvement with their patient-clients across each domain. Facets of the model are illustrated through a set of clinical cases to demonstrate how health practitioners can address eHealth literacy issues in clinical or public health practice. Potential future applications of the model are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
eHealth literacy lily model
Figure 2
Figure 2
eHealth literacy analytic model
Figure 3
Figure 3
eHealth literacy context-specific model

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. National Center for Educational Statistics, authors. National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NAAL): A First Look at the Literacy of America's Adults in the 21st Century. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education; 2005.
    1. Statistics Canada, authors. Building on Our Competencies: Canadian Results of the International Adult Literacy and Skills Survey, 2003. Ottawa, ON: Human Resources and Skills Development Canada and Statistics Canada; 2005.
    1. Veenhof B, Clermont Y, Sciadas G. Literacy and Digital Technologies: Linkages and Outcomes. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada; 2005. [2006 Jun 16]. 5GgNVxIDu http://www.statcan.ca/bsolc/english/bsolc?catno=56F0004MIE2005012
    1. Barbot Janine. How to build an "active" patient? The work of AIDS associations in France. Soc Sci Med. 2006 Feb;62(3):538–51. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.06.025.S0277-9536(05)00309-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rootman Irving. Literacy and health in Canada: is it really a problem? Can J Public Health. 2003;94(6):405–6. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types