Quantity discrimination in female mosquitofish
- PMID: 16868736
- DOI: 10.1007/s10071-006-0036-5
Quantity discrimination in female mosquitofish
Abstract
The ability in animals to count and represent different numbers of objects has received a great deal of attention in the past few decades. Cumulative evidence from comparative studies on number discriminations report obvious analogies among human babies, non-human primates and birds and are consistent with the hypothesis of two distinct and widespread mechanisms, one for counting small numbers (<4) precisely, and one for quantifying large numbers approximately. We investigated the ability to discriminate among different numerosities, in a distantly related species, the mosquitofish, by using the spontaneous choice of a gravid female to join large groups of females as protection from a sexually harassing male. In one experiment, we found that females were able to discriminate between two shoals with a 1:2 numerosity ratio (2 vs. 4, 4 vs. 8 and 8 vs. 16 fish) but failed to discriminate a 2:3 ratio (8 vs. 12 fish). In the second experiment, we studied the ability to discriminate between shoals that differed by one element; females were able to select the larger shoal when the paired numbers were 2 vs. 3 or 3 vs. 4 but not 4 vs. 5 or 5 vs. 6. Our study indicates that numerical abilities in fish are comparable with those of other non-verbal creatures studied; results are in agreement with the hypothesis of the existence of two distinct systems for quantity discrimination in vertebrates.
Similar articles
-
Do fish count? Spontaneous discrimination of quantity in female mosquitofish.Anim Cogn. 2008 Jul;11(3):495-503. doi: 10.1007/s10071-008-0140-9. Epub 2008 Feb 5. Anim Cogn. 2008. PMID: 18247068
-
Spontaneous number representation in mosquitofish.Cognition. 2009 Aug;112(2):343-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.009. Epub 2009 Jun 10. Cognition. 2009. PMID: 19520367
-
Quantity discrimination in Tenebrio molitor: evidence of numerosity discrimination in an invertebrate?Anim Cogn. 2009 May;12(3):463-70. doi: 10.1007/s10071-008-0207-7. Epub 2009 Jan 1. Anim Cogn. 2009. PMID: 19118405
-
Spontaneous versus trained numerical abilities. A comparison between the two main tools to study numerical competence in non-human animals.J Neurosci Methods. 2014 Aug 30;234:82-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.04.027. Epub 2014 May 2. J Neurosci Methods. 2014. PMID: 24793399 Review.
-
The development of arithmetical abilities.J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2005 Jan;46(1):3-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00374.x. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2005. PMID: 15660640 Review.
Cited by
-
Food Quantity Discrimination in Angelfish (Pterophyllum scalare): The Role of Number, Density, Size and Area Occupied by the Food Items.Front Behav Neurosci. 2020 Jun 23;14:106. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2020.00106. eCollection 2020. Front Behav Neurosci. 2020. PMID: 32655384 Free PMC article.
-
Summation by Asian Elephants (Elephas maximus).Behav Sci (Basel). 2012 Mar 27;2(2):50-56. doi: 10.3390/bs2020050. eCollection 2012 Jun. Behav Sci (Basel). 2012. PMID: 25379215 Free PMC article.
-
Perception of Food Amounts by Chimpanzees Based on the Number, Size, Contour Length and Visibility of Items.Anim Behav. 2008 May;75(5):1793-1802. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.10.035. Anim Behav. 2008. PMID: 19412322 Free PMC article.
-
Representational format determines numerical competence in monkeys.Nat Commun. 2011 Mar 29;2:257. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1262. Nat Commun. 2011. PMID: 21448156 Free PMC article.
-
Significant Inter-Test Reliability across Approximate Number System Assessments.Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 8;7:310. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00310. eCollection 2016. Front Psychol. 2016. PMID: 27014126 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous