Continuous vs. intermittent cefotaxime administration in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and respiratory tract infections: pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, bacterial susceptibility and clinical efficacy
- PMID: 16869814
- PMCID: PMC2000713
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2006.02730.x
Continuous vs. intermittent cefotaxime administration in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and respiratory tract infections: pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, bacterial susceptibility and clinical efficacy
Abstract
Aim: To compare the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, antibiotic resistance and clinical efficacy of continuous (CA) vs. intermittent administration (IA) of cefotaxime in patients with obstructive pulmonary disease and respiratory infections.
Methods: A randomized controlled prospective nonblinded study was performed in 93 consecutive hospitalized patients requiring antibiotics for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Forty-seven patients received 2 g of cefotaxime intravenously over 24 h plus a loading dose of 1 g, and 46 patients were given the drug intermittently (1 g three times daily).
Results: Similar pathogens were identified in both groups, being mostly Haemophilus influenzae (51%), Streptococcus pneumoniae (21%) and Moraxella catharralis (18%). Mean minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values were also similar before and after treatment in both groups. Clinical cure was achieved in 37/40 (93%) (CA) vs. 40/43 (93%) (IA) of patients (P = 0.93). In microbiologically evaluable patients, criteria such as 70% of treatment time with antibiotic concentrations > or = MIC (CA 100%vs. IA 60% of patients) and/or > or = 5 x MIC (CA 100%vs. IA 55% of patients) were significantly better following continuous administration (P < 0.01). Samples with suboptimal antibiotic concentrations were found in 0% of CA vs. 65% of IA patients (P < 0.01).
Conclusions: Although clinical cure rates were comparable, continuous cefotaxime administration led to significantly greater proportions of concentrations > MIC and > 5 x MIC compared with intermittent dosing. Continuous administration of cefotaxime at a lower dose [2 g (CA) vs. 3 g (CI)] is equally effective pharmacodynamically and microbiologically, may be more cost-effective and offers at least the same clinical efficacy. Based on these observations, we recommend continuous administration of cefotaxime as the preferred mode of administration.
Similar articles
-
Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of garenoxacin in patients with community-acquired respiratory tract infections.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004 Dec;48(12):4766-77. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.12.4766-4777.2004. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004. PMID: 15561855 Free PMC article.
-
Intrapulmonary pharmacodynamics of high-dose levofloxacin in subjects with chronic bronchitis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2007 Nov;30(5):422-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2007.05.023. Epub 2007 Aug 22. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2007. PMID: 17716873
-
Clinical efficacy of continuous infusion of piperacillin compared with intermittent dosing in septic critically ill patients.Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2006 Aug;28(2):122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2006.02.020. Epub 2006 Jul 3. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2006. PMID: 16815689 Clinical Trial.
-
Differences between ceftriaxone and cefotaxime: microbiological inconsistencies.Ann Pharmacother. 2008 Jan;42(1):71-9. doi: 10.1345/aph.1H620. Epub 2007 Dec 19. Ann Pharmacother. 2008. PMID: 18094350 Review.
-
Antibacterial therapy of acute infectious exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Georgian Med News. 2008 Jun;(159):27-30. Georgian Med News. 2008. PMID: 18633147 Review.
Cited by
-
Intraosseous and intravenous administration of antibiotics yields comparable plasma concentrations during experimental septic shock.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Mar;59(3):346-53. doi: 10.1111/aas.12454. Epub 2015 Jan 5. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015. PMID: 25557933 Free PMC article.
-
Rationale and Logistics of Continuous Infusion Cephalosporin Antibiotics.Pharmacy (Basel). 2024 Dec 5;12(6):185. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy12060185. Pharmacy (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39728850 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Continuous infusion of antibiotics in the critically ill: The new holy grail for beta-lactams and vancomycin?Ann Intensive Care. 2012 Jul 2;2(1):22. doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-2-22. Ann Intensive Care. 2012. PMID: 22747633 Free PMC article.
-
Beta-Lactam Infusion in Severe Sepsis (BLISS): a prospective, two-centre, open-labelled randomised controlled trial of continuous versus intermittent beta-lactam infusion in critically ill patients with severe sepsis.Intensive Care Med. 2016 Oct;42(10):1535-1545. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-4188-0. Epub 2016 Jan 11. Intensive Care Med. 2016. PMID: 26754759 Clinical Trial.
-
Dose optimization of cefotaxime as pre-emptive treatment in critically ill adult patients: A population pharmacokinetic study.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Feb;89(2):705-713. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15487. Epub 2022 Sep 27. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2023. PMID: 35942921 Free PMC article.
References
-
- MacGowan AP, Bowker KE. Continuous infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1998;35:391–402. - PubMed
-
- Turnidge JD. The pharmacodynamics of beta-lactams. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;27:10–22. - PubMed
-
- Gould IM, MacKenzie FM. Antibiotic exposure as a risk factor for emergence of resistance: the influence of concentration. J Appl Microbiol. 2002;92(Suppl.):78S–84S. - PubMed
-
- Metlay JP, Singer DE. Outcomes in lower respiratory tract infections and the impact of antimicrobial drug resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2002;8(Suppl. 2):1–11. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical