Tobacco industry sponsorship of a book and conflict of interest
- PMID: 16869850
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01382.x
Tobacco industry sponsorship of a book and conflict of interest
Abstract
Aim: The tobacco industry has hidden its involvement in the design, conduct and publication of scientific research articles and has used the articles to argue against tobacco regulation. The objective of this study is to examine tobacco industry involvement in the development of scientific books.
Design: Qualitative analysis of previously secret internal tobacco industry documents retrieved from the Legacy Tobacco Documents Library (http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu). Information from the documents was supplemented with material from Internet searches, the National Center for Biotechnology Information Pubmed database and interviews with individuals involved in book publication.
Findings: Between 1997 and 1999 the tobacco industry sponsored a monograph, entitled 'Analytical Determination of Nicotine and Related Compounds and their Metabolites', that examined the measurement and metabolism of nicotine. The tobacco industry recruited Elsevier Science to publish the monograph. Tobacco industry executives, lawyers and scientists reviewed the chapters. One use of the monograph was to stimulate collaborative efforts between academic and tobacco industry scientists. Another was to provide the book to a government regulatory agency reviewing the teratogenic effects of nicotine.
Conclusion: Our findings show the breadth of tobacco industry engagement in scientific knowledge production and dissemination, and its motives for sponsoring scientific literature. The industry's effort to gain credibility through collaboration with academic scientists raises questions regarding the ethics of accepting tobacco industry funding for publication. Scientists who collaborate on publications sponsored by the tobacco industry must consider the full implications of these joint efforts.
Similar articles
-
Changing conclusions on secondhand smoke in a sudden infant death syndrome review funded by the tobacco industry.Pediatrics. 2005 Mar;115(3):e356-66. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1922. Pediatrics. 2005. PMID: 15741361
-
Alcohol research and the alcoholic beverage industry: issues, concerns and conflicts of interest.Addiction. 2009 Feb;104 Suppl 1:34-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02433.x. Addiction. 2009. PMID: 19133913
-
Turning free speech into corporate speech: Philip Morris' efforts to influence U.S. and European journalists regarding the U.S. EPA report on secondhand smoke.Prev Med. 2004 Sep;39(3):568-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.02.014. Prev Med. 2004. PMID: 15313097 Review.
-
'It's interesting how few people die from smoking': tobacco industry efforts to minimize risk and discredit health promotion.Eur J Public Health. 2007 Apr;17(2):162-70. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckl097. Epub 2006 Jul 12. Eur J Public Health. 2007. PMID: 16837518
-
Funding food science and nutrition research: financial conflicts and scientific integrity.Nutr Rev. 2009 May;67(5):264-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2009.00188.x. Nutr Rev. 2009. PMID: 19386030 Review.
Cited by
-
A critical evaluation of the volume, relevance and quality of evidence submitted by the tobacco industry to oppose standardised packaging of tobacco products.BMJ Open. 2014 Feb 12;4(2):e003757. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003757. BMJ Open. 2014. PMID: 24523419 Free PMC article.
-
Conflicts of interest in research on electronic cigarettes.Tob Induc Dis. 2018 Jun 1;16:28. doi: 10.18332/tid/90668. eCollection 2018. Tob Induc Dis. 2018. PMID: 31516428 Free PMC article.
-
New policy on disclosures at Health Services Research.Health Serv Res. 2006 Oct;41(5):1721-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00656.x. Health Serv Res. 2006. PMID: 16987299 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Old ways, new means: tobacco industry funding of academic and private sector scientists since the Master Settlement Agreement.Tob Control. 2007 Jun;16(3):157-64. doi: 10.1136/tc.2006.017186. Tob Control. 2007. PMID: 17565125 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Tobacco company efforts to influence the Food and Drug Administration-commissioned Institute of Medicine report clearing the smoke: an analysis of documents released through litigation.PLoS Med. 2013;10(5):e1001450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001450. Epub 2013 May 28. PLoS Med. 2013. PMID: 23723740 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources