Improving the quality of reporting randomized controlled trials in cardiothoracic surgery: the way forward
- PMID: 16872940
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.10.056
Improving the quality of reporting randomized controlled trials in cardiothoracic surgery: the way forward
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in cardiothoracic surgery, to identify factors associated with good reporting quality, and to assess the awareness of the Consolidated Standards for Reporting of Trials statement and ascertain the views of authors reporting randomized controlled trials on the difficulties in conducting randomized controlled trials and the possible ways to further improve the reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in cardiothoracic surgery.
Methods: Randomized controlled trials of cardiothoracic surgery published in principal cardiothoracic and 4 general medical journals in 2003 were included. The quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials was assessed by using allocation concealment, the Jadad score, and a Consolidated Standards for Reporting of Trials checklist devised for the purpose. A questionnaire survey of authors reporting randomized controlled trials in principal cardiothoracic journals in 2003 was conducted.
Results: The overall reporting quality of the 64 randomized controlled trials included in the analysis was suboptimal as assessed by the 3 methods adopted. Most of the authors (63.5%) were not aware of the Consolidated Standards for Reporting of Trials statement; however, awareness was not associated with reporting quality. More than 65% of the authors responded that conducting randomized controlled trials in surgical specialties was difficult, and the main difficulties were blinding and obtaining a large-enough sample size to detect statistically significant differences. Fifty-four percent of the authors responded that endorsement of the Consolidated Standards for Reporting of Trials statement by the cardiothoracic journals may improve the reporting quality.
Conclusions: The quality of reporting randomized controlled trials in cardiothoracic surgery is suboptimal. Endorsement of the Consolidated Standards for Reporting of Trials statement by the cardiothoracic journals may improve the quality of reporting.
Comment in
-
CONSORT and beyond.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Aug;132(2):229-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.03.040. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006. PMID: 16872939 No abstract available.
-
Randomized clinical trials in surgery: why do we need them?J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Aug;132(2):241-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.03.039. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006. PMID: 16872941 No abstract available.
-
Randomized controlled trials in surgery: comic opera no more?J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Aug;132(2):243-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.03.041. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006. PMID: 16872942 No abstract available.
-
Reports of clinical trials: ethical aspects.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Aug;132(2):245-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.03.042. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006. PMID: 16872943 No abstract available.
-
Improving the quality of clinical trials in surgery.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Aug;132(2):247-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.03.043. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006. PMID: 16872944 No abstract available.
-
Believability of clinical trials: a diagnostic testing perspective.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Aug;132(2):249-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.03.044. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006. PMID: 16872945 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources