Effect of frequency and pulse duration on human muscle fatigue during repetitive electrical stimulation
- PMID: 16873456
- DOI: 10.1113/expphysiol.2006.033886
Effect of frequency and pulse duration on human muscle fatigue during repetitive electrical stimulation
Abstract
Different combinations of stimulation frequency and intensity can generate a targeted force during functional electrical stimulation (FES). This study compared isometric performance and muscle fatigue during repetitive stimulation with three different combinations of frequency and pulse duration that produced the same initial peak forces: protocol 1 used long pulse duration (fixed at 600 micros) and 11.5 +/- 1.2 Hz (low frequency); protocol 2 used 30 Hz (medium frequency) and medium pulse duration (150 +/- 21 micros); and protocol 3 used 60 Hz (high frequency) and short pulse duration (131 +/- 24 micros). Twenty and 60 Hz pre- and postfatigue testing trains were delivered at the pulse duration used by the fatiguing trains and at 600 micros pulse duration. The percentage decline in peak force between the first and last fatiguing train of each protocol was the measure of muscle performance. The declines in peak force of the 60 Hz testing trains were used to measure muscle fatigue. The 20 Hz:60 Hz peak force ratio was used as a measure of low-frequency fatigue. The results showed that protocol 1 produced the least decline in peak force in response to the fatiguing trains, as well as the least muscle fatigue and low-frequency fatigue when the pulse duration was maintained at the level used by the fatiguing trains. Interestingly, protocol 2 produced the least muscle fatigue, and there were no differences in the levels of low-frequency fatigue across protocols when a comparable motor unit population was tested using 600 micros pulse duration. The results suggest that if the frequency and intensity are kept constant during FES, using the lowest frequency and longest pulse duration may maximize performance.
Similar articles
-
Fatigue of paralyzed and control thenar muscles induced by variable or constant frequency stimulation.J Neurophysiol. 2003 Apr;89(4):2055-64. doi: 10.1152/jn.01002.2002. Epub 2002 Dec 11. J Neurophysiol. 2003. PMID: 12611940
-
Effects of stimulation frequency and pulse duration on fatigue and metabolic cost during a single bout of neuromuscular electrical stimulation.Muscle Nerve. 2010 May;41(5):667-78. doi: 10.1002/mus.21572. Muscle Nerve. 2010. PMID: 20082417
-
Effect of electrical stimulation pattern on the force responses of paralyzed human quadriceps muscles.Muscle Nerve. 2007 Apr;35(4):471-8. doi: 10.1002/mus.20717. Muscle Nerve. 2007. PMID: 17212347
-
Catchlike property of skeletal muscle: recent findings and clinical implications.Muscle Nerve. 2005 Jun;31(6):681-93. doi: 10.1002/mus.20290. Muscle Nerve. 2005. PMID: 15736271 Review.
-
High-and low-frequency fatigue revisited.Acta Physiol Scand. 1996 Mar;156(3):265-70. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-201X.1996.192000.x. Acta Physiol Scand. 1996. PMID: 8729686 Review.
Cited by
-
Centrally mediated responses to NMES are influenced by muscle group and stimulation parameters.Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 22;14(1):24918. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75145-2. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39438501 Free PMC article.
-
Evoked EMG versus muscle torque during fatiguing functional electrical stimulation-evoked muscle contractions and short-term recovery in individuals with spinal cord injury.Sensors (Basel). 2014 Dec 3;14(12):22907-20. doi: 10.3390/s141222907. Sensors (Basel). 2014. PMID: 25479324 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Can the Use of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Be Improved to Optimize Quadriceps Strengthening?Sports Health. 2016 Jan-Feb;8(1):79-85. doi: 10.1177/1941738115618174. Sports Health. 2016. PMID: 26582349 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A model for transcutaneous current stimulation: simulations and experiments.Med Biol Eng Comput. 2009 Mar;47(3):279-89. doi: 10.1007/s11517-008-0422-z. Epub 2008 Nov 13. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2009. PMID: 19005714
-
Higher-order power harmonics of pulsed electrical stimulation modulates corticospinal contribution of peripheral nerve stimulation.Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 3;7:43619. doi: 10.1038/srep43619. Sci Rep. 2017. PMID: 28256638 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous