Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 Aug;59(8):813-26.
doi: 10.1136/jcp.2005.033019.

Lymphoproliferative lesions of the skin

Affiliations
Review

Lymphoproliferative lesions of the skin

L Cerroni. J Clin Pathol. 2006 Aug.

Abstract

Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders is one of the most difficult areas in dermatopathology, and biopsies are often taken to rule out a cutaneous lymphoma in patients with "unclear" or "therapy-resistant" skin lesions. Histopathological features alone often enable a given case to be classified to a diagnostic group (eg, epidermotropic lymphomas), but seldom allow a definitive diagnosis to be made. Performing several biopsies from morphologically different lesions is suggested, especially in patients with suspicion of mycosis fungoides. Immunohistochemistry is often crucial for proper classification of the cases, but in some instances is not helpful (eg, early lesions of mycosis fungoides). Although molecular techniques provide new, powerful tools for diagnosing cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders, results of molecular methods should always be interpreted with the clinicopathological features, keeping in mind the possibility of false positivity and false negativity. In many cases, a definitive diagnosis can be made only on careful correlation of the clinical with the histopathological, immunophenotypical and molecular features.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. Willemze R, Jaffe E S, Burg G.et al WHO‐EORTC classification for cutaneous lymphomas. Blood 20051053768–3785. - PubMed
    1. Fink‐Puches R, Zenahlik P, Böck B.et al Primary cutaneous lymphomas: applicability of current classification schemes (EORTC, WHO) based on clinicopathologic features observed in a large group of patients. Blood 200299800–805. - PubMed
    1. Cerroni L, Gatter K, Kerl H.An illustrated guide to skin lymphoma 2nd edn. Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 2004
    1. Massone C, Kodama K, Kerl H.et al Histopathologic features of early (patch) lesions of mycosis fungoides. A morphologic study on 745 biopsy specimens from 427 patients. Am J Surg Pathol 200529550–560. - PubMed
    1. Ming M, LeBoit P E. Can dermatopathologists reliably make the diagnosis of mycosis fungoides? If not, who can? Arch Dermatol 2000136543–546. - PubMed