Factors predictive of preferred place of death in the general population of South Australia
- PMID: 16875116
- DOI: 10.1191/0269216306pm1149oa
Factors predictive of preferred place of death in the general population of South Australia
Abstract
In a population survey, 2652 respondents aged 15+ years reported their preferred place of death, if dying of 'a terminal illness such as cancer or emphysema', to be home (70%), a hospital (19%), hospice (10%), or nursing home (<1%). The majority of respondents in all socio-demographic categories reported a preference for dying at home, with the greatest majorities occurring in younger age groups. After weighting to the age-sex distribution of all South Australian cancer deaths, 58% in our survey declared a preference to die at home, which is much higher than the 14% of cancer deaths that actually occurred at home in South Australia in 2000-2002. Multivariable analyses indicate that predictors of preferred home death include younger age, male, born in the UK/Ireland or Italy/Greece, better physical health, poorer mental health, and fewer concerns about dying at home. Predictors of preference for death in a hospice rather than hospital include older age, female, single, metropolitan residence, having higher educational and income levels, paid employment, awareness of advanced directives, and interpreting 'dying with dignity' as death without pain or suffering. Investigating the differences between preferred and actual places of death may assist service providers to meet end-of-life wishes.
Similar articles
-
When death is imminent: where terminally ill patients with cancer prefer to die and why.Cancer Nurs. 2003 Jun;26(3):245-51. doi: 10.1097/00002820-200306000-00012. Cancer Nurs. 2003. PMID: 12832958
-
Determinants of congruence between the preferred and actual place of death for terminally ill cancer patients.J Palliat Care. 2003 Winter;19(4):230-7. J Palliat Care. 2003. PMID: 14959592
-
Actual and preferred place of death of cancer patients. Results from the Italian survey of the dying of cancer (ISDOC).J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 May;60(5):412-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.043646. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006. PMID: 16614331 Free PMC article.
-
["Good dying"--definition and current state of research].Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2015 Aug;140(17):1296-301. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-102676. Epub 2015 Aug 25. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2015. PMID: 26306020 Review. German.
-
Determinants of place of death for terminal cancer patients.Cancer Invest. 2001;19(2):165-80. doi: 10.1081/cnv-100000151. Cancer Invest. 2001. PMID: 11296621 Review.
Cited by
-
Family member perspectives of deceased relatives' end-of-life options on admission to a palliative care unit in Japan.Support Care Cancer. 2012 May;20(5):893-900. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1405-z. Epub 2012 Feb 23. Support Care Cancer. 2012. PMID: 22354623
-
Post-mortal bereavement of family caregivers in Germany: a prospective interview-based investigation.Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2010 Jul;122(13-14):384-9. doi: 10.1007/s00508-010-1396-z. Epub 2010 Jul 8. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2010. PMID: 20602281
-
Costs and advance directives at the end of life: a case of the 'Coaching Older Adults and Carers to have their preferences Heard (COACH)' trial.BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec 9;15:545. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1201-9. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015. PMID: 26645745 Free PMC article.
-
Public preferences and priorities for end-of-life care in Kenya: a population-based street survey.BMC Palliat Care. 2014 Feb 15;13(1):4. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-13-4. BMC Palliat Care. 2014. PMID: 24529217 Free PMC article.
-
Factors Associated with End-of-Life Health Service Use in Patients Dying of Cancer.Healthc Policy. 2010 Feb;5(3):e125-43. Healthc Policy. 2010. PMID: 21286260 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources