ST-segment depression in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: quantitative analysis may not provide incremental prognostic value beyond comprehensive risk stratification
- PMID: 16875907
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.12.003
ST-segment depression in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: quantitative analysis may not provide incremental prognostic value beyond comprehensive risk stratification
Abstract
Background: It is unclear whether quantitative ST-segment assessment can improve risk stratification of unselected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients using the validated Global Registry of Acute Cardiac Events (GRACE) risk model.
Methods: In the prospective, multicenter, Canadian ACS Registry, the admission electrocardiogram was evaluated centrally at a blinded core laboratory. Patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and other electrocardiogram confounders were excluded. ST depression (ST down) was measured and summed in all leads except aVR. Patients with ST down were divided into 3 groups based on tertiles of cumulative ST down. A multivariable model was developed to examine the independent prognostic value of ST down severity after adjusting for other known prognosticators in the GRACE risk model.
Results: Among 2590 patients with non-ST-elevation ACS, more severe ST down was associated with advanced age, higher heart rate and Killip class, elevated creatinine, abnormal biomarkers, higher GRACE risk score, and higher 1-year mortality (all P < .001). After adjusting for these confounding prognosticators, the presence of any ST down remained independently associated with higher 1-year mortality (odds ratio 1.78, 95% CI 1.21-2.63, P = .004). However, the gradient of risk with increasing magnitude of ST down was no longer evident (adjusted odds ratios 1.77, 1.77, 1.81, for ascending tertiles of cumulative ST down, respectively). Moreover, quantitative ST down did not improve the model discrimination for 1-year mortality. The results were similar when the number of leads with ST down or the maximum magnitude of ST down was analyzed, after adjusting for tertiles of GRACE risk score or inhospital revascularization, or using the composite end point of death or myocardial (re)infarction at 1 year.
Conclusions: Greater ST down is associated with other adverse prognosticators across the broad spectrum of non-ST-elevation ACS. Although the presence of any ST down is an independent predictor of 1-year mortality, its quantitative assessment is not as important as its mere presence when studied on the background of comprehensive clinical and biomarker evaluation in a nonclinical trial-based ACS population.
Similar articles
-
Quantitative troponin elevation does not provide incremental prognostic value beyond comprehensive risk stratification in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.Am Heart J. 2008 Apr;155(4):718-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.11.012. Epub 2008 Feb 21. Am Heart J. 2008. PMID: 18371482
-
Clinical trial--derived risk model may not generalize to real-world patients with acute coronary syndrome.Am Heart J. 2004 Dec;148(6):1020-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.02.014. Am Heart J. 2004. PMID: 15632888
-
Long-term prognostic value and therapeutic implications of continuous ST-segment monitoring in acute coronary syndrome.Am Heart J. 2007 Apr;153(4):500-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.02.003. Am Heart J. 2007. PMID: 17383285
-
Acute coronary care in the elderly, part I: Non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology: in collaboration with the Society of Geriatric Cardiology.Circulation. 2007 May 15;115(19):2549-69. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.182615. Circulation. 2007. PMID: 17502590 Review.
-
[Prognostic stratification in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: how and why].G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2006 Apr;7(4 Suppl 1):7S-12S. G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2006. PMID: 16749286 Review. Italian.
Cited by
-
Long-Term clinical outcomes according to initial management and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction risk score in patients with acute non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Yonsei Med J. 2010 Jan;51(1):58-68. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2010.51.1.58. Epub 2009 Dec 29. Yonsei Med J. 2010. PMID: 20046515 Free PMC article.
-
Variations of electrocardiographic parameters during hospitalization predict long-term outcomes in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2019 Mar;24(2):e12613. doi: 10.1111/anec.12613. Epub 2018 Nov 14. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2019. PMID: 30427092 Free PMC article.
-
Predictive Value of Serial ECGs in Patients with Suspected Myocardial Infarction.J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 20;9(7):2303. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072303. J Clin Med. 2020. PMID: 32698466 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic value of admission electrocardiographic findings in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Clin Cardiol. 2020 Jun;43(6):574-580. doi: 10.1002/clc.23349. Epub 2020 Mar 3. Clin Cardiol. 2020. PMID: 32125713 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative clinical implications of admission electrocardiographic findings for patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Sep;95(37):e4862. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004862. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016. PMID: 27631250 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical