Patient preferences for partner notification
- PMID: 16877586
- PMCID: PMC2564722
- DOI: 10.1136/sti.2005.018119
Patient preferences for partner notification
Abstract
Objective: To identify patient preferences for notification of sexual contacts when a sexually transmitted infection (STI) is diagnosed.
Methods: A questionnaire survey of 2544 patients attending three large genitourinary clinics at Derby, Birmingham, and Coventry in the United Kingdom.
Results: The median age of the respondents was 24 with 1474 (57.9%) women, 1835 (72.1%) white, 1826 (71.8%) single. The most favoured method of partner notification was patient referral, which was rated a "good" method by 65.8% when they had to be contacted because a sexual partner has an STI. Notifying contacts by letter as a method of provider partner notification is more acceptable than phoning, text messaging, or email. Respondents with access to mobile telephones, private emails, and private letters were more likely to rate a method of partner notification using that mode of communication as "good" compared to those without. With provider referral methods of partner notification respondents preferred to receive a letter, email, or text message asking them to contact the clinic rather than a letter, email or text message informing them that they may have an STI.
Conclusion: Most respondents think that being informed directly by a partner is the best method of being notified of the risk of an STI. Some of the newer methods may not be acceptable to all but a significant minority of respondents prefer these methods of partner notification. The wording of letters, emails, or text messages when used for partner notification has an influence on the acceptability of the method and may influence success of the partner notification method. Services should be flexible enough to utilise the patients' preferred method of partner notification.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interest: none.
Similar articles
-
Preferences for partner notification method: variation in responses between respondents as index patients and contacts.Int J STD AIDS. 2007 Jul;18(7):493-4. doi: 10.1258/095646207781147238. Int J STD AIDS. 2007. PMID: 17650574
-
Initial evaluation of use of an online partner notification tool for STI, called 'suggest a test': a cross sectional pilot study.Sex Transm Infect. 2014 May;90(3):195-200. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2013-051254. Epub 2014 Jan 3. Sex Transm Infect. 2014. PMID: 24391062
-
A survey of the use of text messaging for communication with partners in the process of provider-led partner notification.Sex Transm Infect. 2015 Mar;91(2):97-9. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2014-051701. Epub 2014 Oct 28. Sex Transm Infect. 2015. PMID: 25352690
-
Partner notification for sexually transmitted diseases.Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Apr 1;44 Suppl 3:S160-74. doi: 10.1086/511429. Clin Infect Dis. 2007. PMID: 17342669 Review.
-
Partner notification for sexually transmitted infections. Why can't we talk about it?N Z Med J. 2012 May 25;125(1355):62-70. N Z Med J. 2012. PMID: 22722217 Review.
Cited by
-
Partner notification.Medicine (Abingdon). 2014 Jun;42(6):314-317. doi: 10.1016/j.mpmed.2014.03.013. Medicine (Abingdon). 2014. PMID: 24966787 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Moving partner notification into the mainstream of routine sexual health care.Sex Transm Infect. 2007 Apr;83(2):169-72. doi: 10.1136/sti.2007.025056. Sex Transm Infect. 2007. PMID: 17435054 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Advancing Partner Notification Through Electronic Communication Technology: A Review of Acceptability and Utilization Research.J Health Commun. 2016 Jun;21(6):629-37. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1128020. Epub 2016 May 4. J Health Commun. 2016. PMID: 27144318 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding attitudes, barriers and challenges in a small island nation to disease and partner notification for HIV and other sexually transmitted infections: a qualitative study.BMC Public Health. 2015 May 2;15:455. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1794-2. BMC Public Health. 2015. PMID: 25934557 Free PMC article.
-
Adolescent patient preferences surrounding partner notification and treatment for sexually transmitted infections.Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;22(1):61-6. doi: 10.1111/acem.12557. Epub 2014 Dec 24. Acad Emerg Med. 2015. PMID: 25545855 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Tomnay J E, Pitts M K, Fairley C K. New technology and partner notification—why aren't we using them? Int J STD AIDS 20051619–22. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical