Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Aug;82(4):327-9.
doi: 10.1136/sti.2005.018119.

Patient preferences for partner notification

Affiliations

Patient preferences for partner notification

A Apoola et al. Sex Transm Infect. 2006 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To identify patient preferences for notification of sexual contacts when a sexually transmitted infection (STI) is diagnosed.

Methods: A questionnaire survey of 2544 patients attending three large genitourinary clinics at Derby, Birmingham, and Coventry in the United Kingdom.

Results: The median age of the respondents was 24 with 1474 (57.9%) women, 1835 (72.1%) white, 1826 (71.8%) single. The most favoured method of partner notification was patient referral, which was rated a "good" method by 65.8% when they had to be contacted because a sexual partner has an STI. Notifying contacts by letter as a method of provider partner notification is more acceptable than phoning, text messaging, or email. Respondents with access to mobile telephones, private emails, and private letters were more likely to rate a method of partner notification using that mode of communication as "good" compared to those without. With provider referral methods of partner notification respondents preferred to receive a letter, email, or text message asking them to contact the clinic rather than a letter, email or text message informing them that they may have an STI.

Conclusion: Most respondents think that being informed directly by a partner is the best method of being notified of the risk of an STI. Some of the newer methods may not be acceptable to all but a significant minority of respondents prefer these methods of partner notification. The wording of letters, emails, or text messages when used for partner notification has an influence on the acceptability of the method and may influence success of the partner notification method. Services should be flexible enough to utilise the patients' preferred method of partner notification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interest: none.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mathews C, Coetzee N, Zwarenstein M.et al Strategies for partner notification for sexually transmitted diseases. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;CD002843. - PubMed
    1. Hennessy M, Williams S P, Mercier M M.et al Designing partner‐notification programs to maximize client participation: a factorial survey approach. Sex Transm Dis 20022992–99. - PubMed
    1. Hogben M, St Lawrence J S, Montano D E.et al Physicians' opinions about partner notification methods: case reporting, patient referral, and provider referral. Sex Transm Infect 20048030–34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wright A, Chippindale S, Mercey D. Investigation into the acceptability and effectiveness of a new contact slip in the management of Chlamydia trachomatis at a London genitourinary medicine clinic. Sex Transm Infect 200278422–424. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tomnay J E, Pitts M K, Fairley C K. New technology and partner notification—why aren't we using them? Int J STD AIDS 20051619–22. - PubMed