Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Aug;32(8):483-6.
doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.013888.

Research ethics committees in Europe: implementing the directive, respecting diversity

A Hedgecoe  1 , F Carvalho, P Lobmayer, F Raka
Affiliations

Research ethics committees in Europe: implementing the directive, respecting diversity

A Hedgecoe et al. J Med Ethics. 2006 Aug.

Abstract

With the recent Clinical Trials Directive, a degree of harmonisation into research ethics committees (RECs) across Europe, including the time taken to assess a trial proposal and the kinds of issues a committee should take into account, has been introduced by the European Union (EU). How four different member states-Hungary, Portugal, Sweden and the UK-have chosen to implement the directive is shown. Although this has resulted in four very different ways of structuring RECs, similar themes are present in all four cases, such as centralisation of control over RECs within member states, harmonisation of REC procedures across the EU and increased role of political decision making with regard to such committees.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Report of the Ad Hoc Advisory Group on the operation of NHS Research Ethics Committees http://www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/11/24/17/04112417.pdf (accessed 14 Apr 2006)
    1. Ashcroft R E, Newson A J, Benn P M W. Reforming research ethics committees. BMJ 2005331587–588. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dawson A J. The Ad Hoc Advisory Group's proposals for research ethics committees: a mixture of the timid, the revolutionary, and the bizarre. J Med Ethics 200531435–436. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kerrison S, Pollock A M. The reform of UK research ethics committees: throwing the baby out with the bath water? J Med Ethics 200531487–489. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001.The approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the member states relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use. Official J Eur Communities. 2001;1;L 121/34 - PubMed

Publication types