Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006;2006(1):59746.
doi: 10.1155/JBB/2006/59746.

Do LINEs have a role in X-chromosome inactivation?

Affiliations

Do LINEs have a role in X-chromosome inactivation?

Mary F Lyon. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2006.

Abstract

There is longstanding evidence that X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) travels less successfully in autosomal than in X-chromosomal chromatin. The interspersed repeat elements LINE1s (L1s) have been suggested as candidates for "boosters" which promote the spread of XCI in the X-chromosome. The present paper reviews the current evidence concerning the possible role of L1s in XCI. Recent evidence, accruing from the human genome sequencing project and other sources, confirms that mammalian X-chromosomes are indeed rich in L1s, except in regions where there are many genes escaping XCI. The density of L1s is the highest in the evolutionarily oldest regions. Recent work on X; autosome translocations in human and mouse suggested failure of stabilization of XCI in autosomal material, so that genes are reactivated, but resistance of autosomal genes to the original silencing is not excluded. The accumulation of L1s on the X-chromosome may have resulted from reduced recombination or late replication. Whether L1s are part of the mechanism of XCI or a result of it remains enigmatic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lyon MF. Gene action in the X-chromosome of the mouse (Mus musculus L.) Nature. 1961;190(4773):372–373. - PubMed
    1. Russell LB, Bangham JW. Variegated-type position effects in the mouse. Genetics. 1961;46(5):509–525. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lyon MF. Cytogenetics, discussion. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Congenital Malformations; July; New York, NY: 1963. pp. 67–68.
    1. Russell LB. Mammalian X-chromosome action: inactivation limited in spread and region of origin. Science. 1963;140:976–978. - PubMed
    1. Penny GD, Kay GF, Sheardown SA, Rastan S, Brockdorff N. Requirement for Xist in X chromosome inactivation. Nature. 1996;379(6561):131–137. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources