Synergistic sedation with oral midazolam as a premedication and intravenous propofol versus intravenous propofol alone in upper gastrointestinal endoscopies in children: a prospective, randomized study
- PMID: 16877984
- DOI: 10.1097/01.mpg.0000228099.04702.39
Synergistic sedation with oral midazolam as a premedication and intravenous propofol versus intravenous propofol alone in upper gastrointestinal endoscopies in children: a prospective, randomized study
Abstract
Objectives: The primary objective of the present study was to compare the required dose of intravenous (IV) propofol between group A (synergistic sedation with an oral dose of midazolam combined with IV propofol) and group B (IV propofol alone), in diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) in pediatric patients. The secondary objective was to compare the safety, the efficacy, the ease of IV line placement and the ease of separation from parents between the 2 groups.
Methods: Fifty-four consecutive children (aged 3 y or older) who underwent UGIE were randomly assigned to 1 of the 2 medication regimens. Patients in group A (n = 26, mean age: 8.1 y) received midazolam (0.5 mg/kg) orally. Thirty minutes after the midazolam dose was given, repeated IV doses of propofol 0.5 mg/kg were administered titrated to achieve the level of deep sedation. Patients in group B (n = 28, mean age: 9 y) received IV propofol alone with the same methodology and sedation end point.
Results: The mean dose (1.8 +/- 0.7 mg/kg) of propofol administered in group A patients was remarkably lower compared with that (2.9 +/- 0.9 mg/kg) of group B. Multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that among sex, age, ASA grade and the type of sedation, the synergistic sedation was the only factor associated with the ease of IV line placement (chi(2) = 16.3, P < 0.001) and the ease of separation from parents (chi(2) = 41.6, P < 0.001). Additional multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that among sex, age, ASA grade and the type of sedation, synergistic sedation was the only factor associated with a higher level of patient comfort (chi(2) = 35.5, P < 0.001). The recovery time was significantly shorter in group B patients (7.7 +/- 3.6 min) compared with that of group A (25.9 +/- 4.1 minutes) (P < 0.01). The 2 regimens were equally safe.
Conclusions: Our data suggest that synergistic sedation with an oral dose of midazolam combined with propofol may benefit the children who undergo UGIE with regard to lower mean dose of propofol used, easier IV line placement, easier separation from the parents, less pain induced by the IV line placement and greater patient comfort.
Similar articles
-
Synergistic sedation with midazolam and propofol versus midazolam and pethidine in colonoscopies: a prospective, randomized study.Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Aug;97(8):1963-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05908.x. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002. PMID: 12190161 Clinical Trial.
-
Deep sedation for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: intravenous propofol alone versus intravenous propofol with oral midazolam premedication.Endoscopy. 2008 Apr;40(4):308-13. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995346. Epub 2007 Dec 5. Endoscopy. 2008. PMID: 18058653 Clinical Trial.
-
Midazolam-ketamine combination for moderate sedation in upper GI endoscopy.J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012 Mar;54(3):422-6. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3182323c75. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012. PMID: 21857244 Clinical Trial.
-
Bispectral index as a guide for titration of propofol during procedural sedation among children.Pediatrics. 2005 Jun;115(6):1666-74. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1979. Pediatrics. 2005. PMID: 15930231 Review.
-
Preparation, premedication and surveillance.Endoscopy. 2003 Feb;35(2):103-11. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-37012. Endoscopy. 2003. PMID: 12561003 Review.
Cited by
-
The benzodiazepine diazepam potentiates responses of α1β2γ2L γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors activated by either γ-aminobutyric acid or allosteric agonists.Anesthesiology. 2013 Jun;118(6):1417-25. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318289bcd3. Anesthesiology. 2013. PMID: 23407108 Free PMC article.
-
Safety of Propofol versus Nonpropofol-Based Sedation in Children Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2018 Jul 30;2018:6501215. doi: 10.1155/2018/6501215. eCollection 2018. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2018. PMID: 30210535 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Sedation in Pediatric Esophagogastroduodenoscopy.Clin Endosc. 2018 Mar;51(2):120-128. doi: 10.5946/ce.2018.028. Epub 2018 Mar 30. Clin Endosc. 2018. PMID: 29618173 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prospective description of coughing, hemodynamic changes, and oxygen desaturation during endoscopic sedation.Dig Dis Sci. 2012 Jul;57(7):1899-907. doi: 10.1007/s10620-012-2057-z. Epub 2012 Jan 24. Dig Dis Sci. 2012. PMID: 22271416
-
Harmony of Duet over Solo: Use of Midazolam or Propofol for Sedative Endoscopy in Pediatric Patients.Clin Endosc. 2013 Jul;46(4):311-2. doi: 10.5946/ce.2013.46.4.311. Epub 2013 Jul 31. Clin Endosc. 2013. PMID: 23964324 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources