A randomised trial comparing genotypic and virtual phenotypic interpretation of HIV drug resistance: the CREST study
- PMID: 16878178
- PMCID: PMC1523224
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pctr.0010018
A randomised trial comparing genotypic and virtual phenotypic interpretation of HIV drug resistance: the CREST study
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of different HIV drug resistance test reports (genotype and virtual phenotype) in patients who were changing their antiretroviral therapy (ART).
Design: Randomised, open-label trial with 48-week followup.
Setting: The study was conducted in a network of primary healthcare sites in Australia and New Zealand.
Participants: Patients failing current ART with plasma HIV RNA > 2000 copies/mL who wished to change their current ART were eligible. Subjects were required to be > 18 years of age, previously treated with ART, have no intercurrent illnesses requiring active therapy, and to have provided written informed consent.
Interventions: Eligible subjects were randomly assigned to receive a genotype (group A) or genotype plus virtual phenotype (group B) prior to selection of their new antiretroviral regimen.
Outcome measures: Patient groups were compared for patterns of ART selection and surrogate outcomes (plasma viral load and CD4 counts) on an intention-to-treat basis over a 48-week period.
Results: Three hundred and twenty seven patients completing >or= one month of followup were included in these analyses. Resistance tests were the primary means by which ART regimens were selected (group A: 64%, group B: 62%; p = 0.32). At 48 weeks, there were no significant differences between the groups for mean change from baseline plasma HIV RNA (group A: 0.68 log copies/mL, group B: 0.58 log copies/mL; p = 0.23) and mean change from baseline CD4+ cell count (group A: 37 cells/mm(3), group B: 50 cells/mm(3); p = 0.28).
Conclusions: In the absence of clear demonstrated benefits arising from the use of the virtual phenotype interpretation, this study suggests resistance testing using genotyping linked to a reliable interpretive algorithm is adequate for the management of HIV infection.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Baseline HIV-1 resistance, virological outcomes, and emergent resistance in the SECOND-LINE trial: an exploratory analysis.Lancet HIV. 2015 Feb;2(2):e42-51. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(14)00061-7. Epub 2015 Jan 20. Lancet HIV. 2015. PMID: 26424460 Clinical Trial.
-
Drug-resistance genotyping in HIV-1 therapy: the VIRADAPT randomised controlled trial.Lancet. 1999 Jun 26;353(9171):2195-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)12291-2. Lancet. 1999. PMID: 10392984 Clinical Trial.
-
Safety and efficacy of the HIV-1 integrase inhibitor raltegravir (MK-0518) in treatment-experienced patients with multidrug-resistant virus: a phase II randomised controlled trial.Lancet. 2007 Apr 14;369(9569):1261-1269. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60597-2. Lancet. 2007. PMID: 17434401 Clinical Trial.
-
Study of the impact of HIV genotypic drug resistance testing on therapy efficacy.Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg. 2001;63(5):447-73. Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg. 2001. PMID: 11813503 Review.
-
[Recommendations from the GESIDA/Spanish AIDS Plan regarding antiretroviral treatment in adults with human immunodeficiency virus infection (update February 2009)].Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2009 Apr;27(4):222-35. doi: 10.1016/j.eimc.2008.11.002. Epub 2009 Feb 26. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2009. PMID: 19246124 Spanish.
Cited by
-
Directly administered antiretroviral therapy for HIV-infected drug users does not have an impact on antiretroviral resistance: results from a randomized controlled trial.J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007 Dec 15;46(5):555-63. doi: 10.1097/qai.0b013e318158c0bd. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007. PMID: 18193497 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Replicative phenotyping adds value to genotypic resistance testing in heavily pre-treated HIV-infected individuals--the Swiss HIV Cohort Study.J Transl Med. 2011 Jan 21;9:14. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-9-14. J Transl Med. 2011. PMID: 21255386 Free PMC article.
-
HIV Drug-Resistant Patient Information Management, Analysis, and Interpretation.JMIR Res Protoc. 2012 Jun 7;1(1):e3. doi: 10.2196/resprot.1930. JMIR Res Protoc. 2012. PMID: 23611761 Free PMC article.
-
Role of tipranavir in treatment of patients with multidrug-resistant HIV.Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2010 Oct 5;6:431-41. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S4207. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2010. PMID: 20957134 Free PMC article.
-
Genotypic susceptibility scores and HIV type 1 RNA responses in treatment-experienced subjects with HIV type 1 infection.AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2008 May;24(5):685-94. doi: 10.1089/aid.2007.0127. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2008. PMID: 18462083 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Larder BA, Darby G, Richman D. HIV with reduced sensitivity to zidovudine (AZT) isolated during prolonged therapy. Science. 1989;243:1731–1734. - PubMed
-
- Smith M, Salomon H, Wainberg MA. Development and significance of nucleoside drug resistance in infection caused by the human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Clin Invest Med. 1994;17((3)):226–243. - PubMed
-
- Mayers DL. Prevalence and incidence of resistance to zidovudine and other antiretroviral drugs. Am J Med. 1997;102:70–75. - PubMed
-
- Condra JH, Schleif WA, Blahy OM, et al. In vivo emergence of HIV-1 variants resistant to multiple protease inhibitors. Nature. 1995;374:569–571. - PubMed
-
- Hirsch MS, Conway B, D'Aquila RT, et al. Antiretroviral drug resistance testing in adults with HIV infection: Implications for clinical management. International AIDS Society—USA Panel. JAMA. 1998;24:1984–1991. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials