Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002;3(1):97-113.
doi: 10.1207/S15327078IN0301_5.

Facial Expressivity at 4 Months: A Context by Expression Analysis

Affiliations

Facial Expressivity at 4 Months: A Context by Expression Analysis

David S Bennett et al. Infancy. 2002.

Abstract

The specificity predicted by differential emotions theory (DET) for early facial expressions in response to 5 different eliciting situations was studied in a sample of 4-month-old infants (n = 150). Infants were videotaped during tickle, sour taste, jack-in-the-box, arm restraint, and masked-stranger situations and their expressions were coded second by second. Infants showed a variety of facial expressions in each situation; however, more infants exhibited positive (joy and surprise) than negative expressions (anger, disgust, fear, and sadness) across all situations except sour taste. Consistent with DET-predicted specificity, joy expressions were the most common in response to tickling, and were less common in response to other situations. Surprise expressions were the most common in response to the jack-in-the-box, as predicted, but also were the most common in response to the arm restraint and masked-stranger situations, indicating a lack of specificity. No evidence of predicted specificity was found for anger, disgust, fear, and sadness expressions. Evidence of individual differences in expressivity within situations, as well as stability in the pattern across situations, underscores the need to examine both child and contextual factors in studying emotional development. The results provide little support for the DET postulate of situational specificity and suggest that a synthesis of differential emotions and dynamic systems theories of emotional expression should be considered.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ackerman, B. P., Abe, J. A. A., & Izard, C. E. (1998). Differential emotions theory and emotional development: Mindful of modularity. In M. F. Mascolo & S. Griffin (Eds.), What develops in emotional development? (pp. 85–106). New York: Plenum.
    1. Bates, J. E. (1989). Concepts and measures of temperament. In G. A. Kohnstamm, J. E. Bates, & M. K. Rothbart (Eds.), Temperament in childhood (pp. 3–26). New York: Wiley.
    1. Bendersky, M., Alessandri, S. M., & Lewis, M. (1996). Emotions in cocaine-exposed infants. In M. Lewis & M. W. Sullivan (Eds.), Emotional development in atypical children (pp. 89–108). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    1. Bendersky M, Lewis M. Arousal modulation in cocaine-exposed infants. Developmental Psychology. 1998;34:555–564. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blumberg SH, Izard CE. Patterns of emotion experiences as predictors of facial expressions of emotion. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. 1991;37:183–198.

LinkOut - more resources