Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Nov;21(11):1188-91.
doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00570.x.

Brief report: identifying a proxy for health care as part of routine medical inquiry

Affiliations

Brief report: identifying a proxy for health care as part of routine medical inquiry

K Michael Lipkin. J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Physician-initiated advance care planning is desirable, effective, and routinely indicated for competent adult patients, but doctors are often reluctant to begin the necessary conversations.

Objective: To determine whether patients are willing and able to designate a surrogate for medical decision making, when asked to do so as part of routine medical inquiry.

Design, patients, measurements: A survey asking patients to name a health care agent was designed and administered in the context of routine clinical care. Participants were drawn from a consecutive sample of 309 competent adult outpatients. Data were analyzed using ordinary descriptive statistics.

Results: Two hundred ninety-eight of 309 patients (response rate, 96%) completed the survey and were willing and able to specify a proxy for health care. One third of married participants did not choose their spouse as proxy.

Conclusions: Asking patients to identify a surrogate for medical decision making opens the door for ongoing individualized medical care planning in the context of ordinary patient-physician interaction. This approach is applicable to all competent adults. Documenting proxy choice protects a patient's wishes and preferences until more definitive planning is accomplished.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Proxy Choice (N=298).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Snyder L, Leffler C. Ethics manual: fifth edition. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:560–82. - PubMed
    1. Kirschner KL. When written advance directives are not enough. Clin Geriatr Med. 2005;21:193–209. - PubMed
    1. Emanuel LL, von Gunten CF, Ferris FD. Advance care planning. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:1181–7. - PubMed
    1. Cox DM, Sachs GA. Advance directives and the patient self-determination act. Clin Geriatr Med. 1994;10:431–43. - PubMed
    1. Lo B, Steinbrook R. Resuscitating advance directives. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1501–6. - PubMed