Repeatability (test-retest variability) of refractive error measurement in clinical settings
- PMID: 16879577
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00695.x
Repeatability (test-retest variability) of refractive error measurement in clinical settings
Abstract
Purpose: To estimate the repeatability of refractive error measurement (REM) in a clinical environment in cataractous, pseudophakic and healthy eyes.
Methods: The refractive error of patients referred for cataract surgery or consultation measured by ophthalmic professionals was re-examined and the measurement results were compared. A total of 99 eyes from 99 persons (41 cataractous, 36 pseudophakic and 22 healthy eyes) with visual acuity (VA) of 0.3-1.3 (logMAR 0.52 to - 0.11) were included. The differences between measurements 1 and 2 were calculated as 3-dimensional vector values and spherical equivalents (SEs) and expressed as the coefficient of repeatability (CR). The mean time interval between the first and second examinations was 45 days.
Results: The CRs for all eyes for vertical (V), torsional (T) and horizontal (H) vectors were 0.74 D, 0.34 D and 0.93 D, respectively. The CR of SE for all eyes was 0.74 D. Eyes with lower VA (0.3-0.45) had larger variability in vector and SE values but the differences between VA groups were not statistically significant. The difference in the mean defocus equivalent (DE) between measurements 1 and 2 was, however, significantly greater in the group with lower VA. In all VA groups the mean difference vector was very close to the zero vector, which means that there was no systematic difference.
Conclusions: Repeatability of refractive error measurements in clinical settings has a certain degree of variability. In this series, the variability in eyes with better VA was not great and was in accordance with earlier findings in healthy eyes. Eyes with lower VA had greater variability due to greater tolerance to defocus. Thus, conclusions concerning changes in the refractive state and the need to make changes in the refractive correction of eyes with poorer vision should be made with caution.
Similar articles
-
Random measurement error in visual acuity measurement in clinical settings.Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2005 Jun;83(3):328-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2005.00469.x. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2005. PMID: 15948786
-
Refractive and visual outcome of paediatric cataract surgery in the Ukraine.Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2006 Oct;84(5):674-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00686.x. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2006. PMID: 16965500
-
Laser in situ keratomileusis versus lens-based surgery for correcting residual refractive error after cataract surgery.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Apr;34(4):562-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.11.040. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008. PMID: 18361976
-
Visual acuity tolerance to residual refractive errors in patients with an apodized diffractive intraocular lens.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Feb;34(2):199-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.10.020. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008. PMID: 18242440
-
Refraction and visual acuity measurements: what are their measurement uncertainties?Clin Exp Optom. 2006 Mar;89(2):66-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2006.00022.x. Clin Exp Optom. 2006. PMID: 16494608 Review.
Cited by
-
Refraction and defocus curves in eyes with monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses.J Optom. 2023 Jul-Sep;16(3):236-243. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2023.01.005. Epub 2023 Mar 23. J Optom. 2023. PMID: 36964069 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluations of refraction competencies of ophthalmic technicians in Mozambique.J Optom. 2016 Jul-Sep;9(3):148-57. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2015.01.003. Epub 2015 Feb 7. J Optom. 2016. PMID: 25662363 Free PMC article.
-
Interexaminer reproducibility for subjective refractions for an ametropic participant.BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2022 May;7(1):e000954. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000954. Epub 2022 May 11. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2022. PMID: 36161849 Free PMC article.
-
Refractive predictability of partial coherence interferometry and factors that can affect it.Korean J Ophthalmol. 2009 Mar;23(1):6-12. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2009.23.1.6. Epub 2009 Mar 9. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2009. PMID: 19337472 Free PMC article.
-
Determination of Personalized IOL-Constants for the Haigis Formula under Consideration of Measurement Precision.PLoS One. 2016 Jul 8;11(7):e0158988. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158988. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27391100 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical