Contamination: a comparison of 2 personal protective systems
- PMID: 16880444
- PMCID: PMC1513425
- DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.060094
Contamination: a comparison of 2 personal protective systems
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to examine the difference in self-contamination rates and levels of contact and droplet protection associated with enhanced respiratory and contact precautions (E-RCP) and a personal protective system that included a full body suit, personal protective equipment and a powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR).
Methods: In this prospective, randomized, controlled crossover study, 50 participants donned and removed E-RCP and PAPR in random order. Surrogate contamination consisted of fluorescein solution and ultraviolet (UV) light- detectable paste, which was applied after each ensemble was donned. A blinded evaluator inspected participants for contamination using a UV lamp after removal of each ensemble. Areas of contamination were counted and measured in square centimetres. Donning and removal violations were recorded. The primary end point was the presence of any contamination on the skin or base clothing layer.
Results: Participants wearing E-RCP were more likely to experience skin and base-clothing contamination; their contamination episodes measuring > or = 1 cm2 were more frequent, and they had larger total areas of contamination (all p < 0.0001). The anterior neck, forearms, wrists and hands were the likeliest zones for contamination. Participants donning PAPR committed more donning procedure violations (p = 0.0034). Donning and removing the PAPR system took longer than donning and removing E-RCP garments (p < 0.0001).
Interpretation: Participants wearing E-RCP were more likely to experience contamination of their skin and base clothing layer. Those wearing PAPR required significantly more time to don and remove the ensemble and violated donning procedures more frequently.
Figures
Comment in
-
Personal protective equipment for preventing respiratory infections: what have we really learned?CMAJ. 2006 Aug 1;175(3):263. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.060685. CMAJ. 2006. PMID: 16880447 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Directive to all Ontario health care facilities/settings for high risk aerosol generating procedures under outbreak conditions. Directive HR04-13 April 15, 2004. Available: www.health.gov.on.ca/english/providers/program/pubhealth/sars/docs/docs3... (accessed 2006 May 17).
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Supplement I: Infection control in healthcare, home, and community settings. Available: www.cdc.gov/ncidod/sars/guidance/I/index.htm (accessed 2006 May 17).
-
- Health Canada. Cluster of severe acute respiratory syndrome cases among protected health care workers — Toronto, April 2003. Can Commun Dis Rep 2003;29:93-7. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases