Contamination: a comparison of 2 personal protective systems
- PMID: 16880444
- PMCID: PMC1513425
- DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.060094
Contamination: a comparison of 2 personal protective systems
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to examine the difference in self-contamination rates and levels of contact and droplet protection associated with enhanced respiratory and contact precautions (E-RCP) and a personal protective system that included a full body suit, personal protective equipment and a powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR).
Methods: In this prospective, randomized, controlled crossover study, 50 participants donned and removed E-RCP and PAPR in random order. Surrogate contamination consisted of fluorescein solution and ultraviolet (UV) light- detectable paste, which was applied after each ensemble was donned. A blinded evaluator inspected participants for contamination using a UV lamp after removal of each ensemble. Areas of contamination were counted and measured in square centimetres. Donning and removal violations were recorded. The primary end point was the presence of any contamination on the skin or base clothing layer.
Results: Participants wearing E-RCP were more likely to experience skin and base-clothing contamination; their contamination episodes measuring > or = 1 cm2 were more frequent, and they had larger total areas of contamination (all p < 0.0001). The anterior neck, forearms, wrists and hands were the likeliest zones for contamination. Participants donning PAPR committed more donning procedure violations (p = 0.0034). Donning and removing the PAPR system took longer than donning and removing E-RCP garments (p < 0.0001).
Interpretation: Participants wearing E-RCP were more likely to experience contamination of their skin and base clothing layer. Those wearing PAPR required significantly more time to don and remove the ensemble and violated donning procedures more frequently.
Figures



Comment in
-
Personal protective equipment for preventing respiratory infections: what have we really learned?CMAJ. 2006 Aug 1;175(3):263. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.060685. CMAJ. 2006. PMID: 16880447 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Contamination of Health Care Personnel During Removal of Personal Protective Equipment.JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Dec;175(12):1904-10. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4535. JAMA Intern Med. 2015. PMID: 26457544
-
A crossover trial comparing contamination of healthcare personnel during removal of a standard gown versus a modified gown with increased skin coverage at the hands and wrists.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019 Nov;40(11):1278-1280. doi: 10.1017/ice.2019.211. Epub 2019 Aug 22. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019. PMID: 31436146 Clinical Trial.
-
Human Factors Risk Analyses of a Doffing Protocol for Ebola-Level Personal Protective Equipment: Mapping Errors to Contamination.Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Mar 5;66(6):950-958. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix957. Clin Infect Dis. 2018. PMID: 29471368 Free PMC article.
-
Wearing an N95 respirator concurrently with a powered air-purifying respirator: effect on protection factor.Respir Care. 2008 Dec;53(12):1685-90. Respir Care. 2008. PMID: 19025703
-
To PAPR or not to PAPR?Can J Respir Ther. 2014 Fall;50(3):87-90. Can J Respir Ther. 2014. PMID: 26078617 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Variation in health care worker removal of personal protective equipment.Am J Infect Control. 2015 Jul 1;43(7):750-1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.02.005. Am J Infect Control. 2015. PMID: 26138659 Free PMC article.
-
Interventional pulmonology during COVID-19 pandemic: current evidence and future perspectives.J Thorac Dis. 2021 Apr;13(4):2495-2509. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-2192. J Thorac Dis. 2021. PMID: 34012596 Free PMC article. Review.
-
AGA Rapid Recommendations for Gastrointestinal Procedures During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Gastroenterology. 2020 Aug;159(2):739-758.e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.03.072. Epub 2020 Apr 1. Gastroenterology. 2020. PMID: 32247018 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
The Use of Bronchoscopy During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: CHEST/AABIP Guideline and Expert Panel Report.Chest. 2020 Sep;158(3):1268-1281. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.04.036. Epub 2020 May 1. Chest. 2020. PMID: 32361152 Free PMC article.
-
Tracheostomy during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: Recommendations from the New York Head and Neck Society.Head Neck. 2020 Jun;42(6):1282-1290. doi: 10.1002/hed.26166. Epub 2020 Apr 20. Head Neck. 2020. PMID: 32304119 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Directive to all Ontario health care facilities/settings for high risk aerosol generating procedures under outbreak conditions. Directive HR04-13 April 15, 2004. Available: www.health.gov.on.ca/english/providers/program/pubhealth/sars/docs/docs3... (accessed 2006 May 17).
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Supplement I: Infection control in healthcare, home, and community settings. Available: www.cdc.gov/ncidod/sars/guidance/I/index.htm (accessed 2006 May 17).
-
- Health Canada. Cluster of severe acute respiratory syndrome cases among protected health care workers — Toronto, April 2003. Can Commun Dis Rep 2003;29:93-7. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases