Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2006 Aug 1;175(3):249-54.
doi: 10.1503/cmaj.060094.

Contamination: a comparison of 2 personal protective systems

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Contamination: a comparison of 2 personal protective systems

Jorge E Zamora et al. CMAJ. .

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to examine the difference in self-contamination rates and levels of contact and droplet protection associated with enhanced respiratory and contact precautions (E-RCP) and a personal protective system that included a full body suit, personal protective equipment and a powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR).

Methods: In this prospective, randomized, controlled crossover study, 50 participants donned and removed E-RCP and PAPR in random order. Surrogate contamination consisted of fluorescein solution and ultraviolet (UV) light- detectable paste, which was applied after each ensemble was donned. A blinded evaluator inspected participants for contamination using a UV lamp after removal of each ensemble. Areas of contamination were counted and measured in square centimetres. Donning and removal violations were recorded. The primary end point was the presence of any contamination on the skin or base clothing layer.

Results: Participants wearing E-RCP were more likely to experience skin and base-clothing contamination; their contamination episodes measuring > or = 1 cm2 were more frequent, and they had larger total areas of contamination (all p < 0.0001). The anterior neck, forearms, wrists and hands were the likeliest zones for contamination. Participants donning PAPR committed more donning procedure violations (p = 0.0034). Donning and removing the PAPR system took longer than donning and removing E-RCP garments (p < 0.0001).

Interpretation: Participants wearing E-RCP were more likely to experience contamination of their skin and base clothing layer. Those wearing PAPR required significantly more time to don and remove the ensemble and violated donning procedures more frequently.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Fig. 1: Enhanced respiratory and contact precautions (E-RCP), familiar to most health care workers. The towel used for neck protection was omitted for illustrative purposes.
None
Fig. 2: The other system studied, named for its powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR), has 2 protective layers, shown above. The outer layer (left panel) consists of a hood, fluid-resistant surgical gown, shoe covers and 2 pairs of fitted surgical gloves. The inner (right) includes a hooded coverall and shoe covers, PAPR power unit, N95 mask, goggles, bouffant hair cover, and 1 pair of fitted surgical gloves. Contamination assessment for this layer was performed with the PAPR power unit and fitted surgical gloves removed. The towel worn to protect the neck has been omitted for illustrative purposes.
None
Fig. 3: Examples of contamination of the forearm, wrist and hand (left panel) and neck of a study participant wearing enhanced respiratory and contact precautions (E-RCP).

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Weber SG, Bottei E, Cook R, et al. SARS, emerging infections, and bioterrorism preparedness. Lancet Infect Dis 2004;4:483-4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Directive to all Ontario health care facilities/settings for high risk aerosol generating procedures under outbreak conditions. Directive HR04-13 April 15, 2004. Available: www.health.gov.on.ca/english/providers/program/pubhealth/sars/docs/docs3... (accessed 2006 May 17).
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Supplement I: Infection control in healthcare, home, and community settings. Available: www.cdc.gov/ncidod/sars/guidance/I/index.htm (accessed 2006 May 17).
    1. Health Canada. Cluster of severe acute respiratory syndrome cases among protected health care workers — Toronto, April 2003. Can Commun Dis Rep 2003;29:93-7. - PubMed
    1. Christian MD, Loutfy M, McDonald LC, et al. Possible SARS Coronavirus transmission during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Emerg Infect Dis 2004;10:287-93. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types