Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2006 Aug;56(529):574-8.

Chest radiography in general practice: indications, diagnostic yield and consequences for patient management

Anouk M Speets  1 , Yolanda van der Graaf, Arno W Hoes, Sandra Kalmijn, Alfred Pe Sachs, Matthieu Jcm Rutten, Jan Willem C Gratama, Alexander D Montauban van Swijndregt, Willem Pthm Mali
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Chest radiography in general practice: indications, diagnostic yield and consequences for patient management

Anouk M Speets et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Chest radiography (CXR) is frequently performed in Western societies. There is insufficient knowledge of its diagnostic value in terms of changes in patient management decisions in primary care.

Aim: To assess the influence of CXR on patient management in general practice.

Design of study: Prospective cohort study.

Setting: Seventy-eight GPs and three general hospitals in the Netherlands.

Method: Patients (n = 792) aged > or =18 years referred by their GPs for CXR were included. The main outcome was change in patient management assessed by means of questionnaires filled in by GPs before and after CXR.

Results: Mean age of the patients was 57.3+/-16.2 years and 53% were male. Clinically relevant abnormalities were found in 24% of the CXRs. Patient management changed in 60% of the patients following CXR. Main changes included: fewer referrals to a medical specialist (from 26 to 12%); reduction in initiation or change in therapy (from 24 to 15%); and more frequent reassurance (from 25 to 46%). However, this reassurance was not perceived as such in a quarter of these patients. A change in patient management occurred significantly more frequently in patients with complaints of cough (67%), those who exhibited abnormalities during physical examination (69%), or those with a suspected diagnosis of pneumonia (68%).

Conclusion: Patient management by the GP changed in 60% of patients following CXR. CXR substantially reduced the number of referrals and initiation or change in therapy, and more patients were reassured by their GP. Thus, CXR is an important diagnostic tool for GPs and seems a cost-effective diagnostic test.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. American College of Radiology. ACR standard for the performance of pediatric and adult chest radiography. United States: American College of Radiology; 2001.
    1. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Medical radiation exposures. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation, Volume I: Sources. New York: United Nations; 2000.
    1. Speets AM, Kalmijn S, Hoes AW, et al. Frequency of chest radiography and abdominal ultrasound in the Netherlands 1999–2003. Eur J Epidemiol. 2005;20:1031–1036. - PubMed
    1. European Commission. Referral guidelines for imaging. Radiation protection 118. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2000.
    1. Coblentz CL, Matzinger F, Samson LM, et al. CAR standards for chest radiography. Canada: Canadian Association of Radiologists; 2000.

Publication types