Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2006 Aug;38(4):275-84.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705441.

Low doses of GM-CSF (molgramostim) and G-CSF (filgrastim) after cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2) enhance the peripheral blood progenitor cell harvest: results of two randomized studies including 120 patients

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Low doses of GM-CSF (molgramostim) and G-CSF (filgrastim) after cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2) enhance the peripheral blood progenitor cell harvest: results of two randomized studies including 120 patients

P Quittet et al. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2006 Aug.

Abstract

The use of a combination of G-CSF and GM-CSF versus G-CSF alone, after cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2) was compared in two randomized phase III studies, including 120 patients. In study A, 60 patients received 5 x 2 microg/kg/day of G-CSF and GM-CSF compared to 5 mug/kg/day of G-CSF. In study B, 60 patients received 2.5 x 2 microg/kg/day G-CSF and GM-CSF compared to G-CSF alone (5 microg/kg/day). With the aim to collect at least 5 x 10(6)/kg CD34 cells in a maximum of three large volume leukapherises (LK), 123 LK were performed in study A, showing a significantly higher number of patients reaching 10 x 10(6)/kg CD34 cells (21/29 in G+GM-CSF arm vs 11/27 in G-CSF arm, P=0.00006). In study B, 109 LK were performed, with similar results (10/27 vs 15/26, P=0.003). In both the study, the total harvest of CD34 cells/kg was twofold higher in G-CSF plus GM-CSF group (18.3 x 10(6) in study A and 15.85 x 10(6) in study B) than in G-CSF group (9 x 10(6) in study A and 8.1 x 10(6) in study B), a significant difference only seen in multiple myeloma, with no significant difference in terms of mobilized myeloma cells between G-CSF and GM-CSF groups.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Design of the study: mobilization and collection of CD34 cells.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Correlation between the estimated number of CD34 cells (%CD34 × WBC × 8)/kg body weight (8 being a coefficient corresponding approximately to 2 blood volumes in L) and the number of collected CD34 cells.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Percentage of patients reaching 5 or 10 × 106 CD34 cells/kg in study B.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Percentage of patients with multiple myeloma and reaching 10 × 106 CD34 cells/kg.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Kinetic of circulating CD34 cells in patients with less (A) and more (B) than one year of prior chemotherapy.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Attal M, Harousseau JL, Stoppa AM, et al. A prospective, randomized trial of autologous bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy in multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:91–97. - PubMed
    1. Harousseau JL. Stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma (0, 1, or 2) Curr Opin Oncol. 2005;17:93–98. - PubMed
    1. Gorin NC. Autologous stem cell transplantation in hematological malignancies. Springer Semin Immunopathol. 2004;26:3–30. - PubMed
    1. Philip T, Guglielmi C, Hagenbeek A, et al. Autologous bone marrow transplantation as compared with salvage chemotherapy in relapses of chemotherapy-sensitive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1540–1545. - PubMed
    1. Gratwohl A, Schmid O, Baldomero H, et al. Accreditation Committee of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in Europe 2002. Changes in indication and impact of team density. A report of the EBMT activity survey. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2004;34:855–875. - PubMed

Publication types